DAYRO G. DELGADO
v.
BIANCA C. ACOSTA-RENTA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellant must provide a transcript or proper substitute record to overcome the presumption of correctness afforded to trial court findings; absent a record and absent fundamental error on the face of the order, affirmance is required.
[1] An appellant bears the burden of presenting a record that overcomes the presumption of correctness afforded to trial court findings, and without a transcript or proper su…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[W]here there is no record of the testimony of witnesses or evidentiary rulings, and where a statement of the record has not been prepared . . . a judgment which is not fundamentally erroneous on its face must be affirmed.”
Statement of the burden on appellants to provide adequate records on appeal
Dayro G. Delgado appealed a judgment from Miami-Dade County Circuit Court in a family law matter. The appellant proceeded in propria persona and did n…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Fundamental Error cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion filed October 2, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-0520 Lower Tribunal No. 16-2574-FC-04
________________
Dayro G. Delgado,
Appellant,
vs.
Bianca C. Acosta-Renta,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Christina Marie DiRaimondo, Judge. Dayro G. Delgado, in proper person. Bianca C. Acosta-Renta, in proper person. Before EMAS, SCALES and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979); Gaspard v. Innocent, 389 So. 3d 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (affirmance required where no transcript or proper substitute and no fundamental error on the face of the order appealed); Mijares v. Echeverria, 365 So. 3d 426 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (reiterating that appellant bears burden of presenting a record that overcomes the presumption of correctness afforded to the trial court’s findings and “[w]here there is no record of the testimony of witnesses or evidentiary rulings, and where a statement of the record has not been prepared . . . a judgment which is not fundamentally erroneous on its face must be affirmed.”)
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dayro G. Delgado v. Bianca C. Acosta-Renta, 365 So. 3d 426 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979); Gaspard v. Innocent, 389 So. 3d 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (affirmance required where no transcript or proper substitute and no fundamental error on the face of the order appealed); Mijares v. Echeverria, 365 So. 3d 426 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (reiterating that appellant bears burden of presen…1 / 2
-
Scott v. Broughton (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)…a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”); Gaspard v. Innocent, 389 So. 3d 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (holding that affirmance is required where there is no transcript or proper substitute and no fundamental error on the face of the order appealed). Affirmed.…
-
Gelati v. Est. of Edmundo Henriquez Ron (Fla. 3d DCA 2026)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Adolf Gaspard v. Fania Innocent, 389 So. 3d 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)
- Dayro G. Delgado v. Bianca C. Acosta-Renta, 365 So. 3d 426 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)