EZRA WASHINGTON
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellant challenging a child support determination must provide a complete appellate record, including a hearing transcript or adequate substitute, to demonstrate reversible error.
[1] In appellate review of administrative determinations, the lower tribunal's findings and final judgment carry a presumption of correctness, and the appellant bears the bur…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceEzra Washington appealed a child support determination issued by the State of Florida Department of Revenue, Child Support Program.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellant'S Burden To Demonstrate Error cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Addison v. Florida Dep’t of Revenue, 322 So. 3d 230, 230–31 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) (“Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that on appeal, decision of lower tribunal ‘has the presumption of correctness,’ appellant bears burden ‘to demonstrate error,’ and ‘the lack of a trial transcript or a proper substitute’ forecloses reversal); Lafaille v. Lafaille, 837 So. 2d 601, 604 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (explaining that lower tribunal’s findings and final judgment ‘cannot be disturbed absent a record demonstrating reversible error,’ and that appellant has burden to present reviewing court ‘with an adequate record to support his appeal’); Moore v. Moore, 512 So. 2d 1141, 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (affirming child support determination because record did not ‘contain a transcript of the hearing resulting in the order appealed’ nor statement of evidence or proceedings pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)).”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ezra Washington v. Dep't of Revenue, 322 So. 3d 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Addison v. Florida Dep’t of Revenue, 322 So. 3d 230, 230–31 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) (“Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that on appeal, decision of lower tribunal ‘has the presumption of correctness,’ appellant bears burden ‘to demonstrate error,’ and ‘t…
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Eddy Lafaille v. Lafaille, 837 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)
- Moore v. Moore, 512 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
- Ezra Washington v. Dep't of Revenue, 322 So. 3d 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)