MICHAEL KING
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The circuit court's judgment is affirmed based on applicable precedent.
Michael King appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, raising criminal appeal issues.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pro Se Representation cases and more on FLexlaw
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Kimberly K. Fernandez, Judge. Michael King, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See King v. State, 235 So. 3d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (table decision); King v. State, 117 So. 3d 1094 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (table decision); Harris v. State, 777 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Wright v. State, 834 So. 2d 879 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Middleton v. State, 721 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). SILBERMAN, BLACK, and SMITH,JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
King v. State, 274 So. 3d 1212 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
Authorities Cited
- Harris v. State, 777 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
- Middleton v. State, 721 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- Wright v. State, 834 So. 2d 879 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
- King v. State, 235 So. 3d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
- Hood v. State, 235 So. 3d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
- King v. State, 274 So. 3d 1212 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)