R.P.
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A hearing officer's adoption of the SSA's disability decision denying Medicaid benefits is affirmed when the applicant fails to provide competent and substantial evidence of qualifying conditions despite having a full and fair hearing opportunity.
[1] A hearing officer's decision denying Medicaid disability benefits is supported by competent and substantial evidence when the applicant, despite receiving notice and a fu…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceR.P. appealed the Department of Children and Families' ratification of the SSA's decision denying him Medicaid disability benefits. Although R.P. clai…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Notice And Hearing Requirements cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 13, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D24-2003 Lower Tribunal Nos. 24F-11032, 1358879869
R.P., Appellant,
vs.
Florida Department of Children and Families, Appellee.
An Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Children and Families, Office of Appeal Hearings.
R.P., in proper person. Rosemarie Rinaldi, Assistant Regional Legal Counsel, for appellee.
Before, FERNANDEZ, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.
GORDO, J.
R.P. appeals from a final order of the Florida Department of Children and Families Office of Appeal Hearings (“Department”) ratifying the Social Security Administration's (“SSA”) decision concerning his eligibility for disability benefits. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(C). We affirm.
R.P. urges us to reverse the Department and the hearing officer's finding that he no longer qualifies for Medicaid disability benefits. But R.P. was given a full and fair opportunity with notice and a hearing to provide evidence that he qualifies for such benefits. Although R.P. mentions in his application that his condition worsened by his own admission at the hearing—he provided no new conditions and was unable to elaborate on any worsening condition or offer any proof. We find the hearing officer had competent and substantial evidence to adopt the SSA's disability decision and deny benefits based on the record before it.1
Affirmed.
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
R.P. v. Fla. Dep't of Child. & Families (Fla. 3d DCA 2026)
Authorities Cited
- R.P. v. Fla. Dep't of Child. & Families (Fla. 3d DCA 2026)