NEELY
v.
ENTREKIN
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court's judgment need not be reversed solely because the court adopts a proposed order verbatim; rather, appellate courts must consider various factors in determining whether the judgment reflects independent judicial decision-making.
[1] A trial court's adoption of a proposed order verbatim does not constitute reversible error; appellate courts must consider various factors to determine whether the judgme…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a judgment need not be reversed solely because a trial court adopts a proposed order verbatim. Instead, there are various factors to be considered by an appellate court in determining whether a judgment reflects a trial judge's independent decision-making”
Citation to King v. King, 363 So. 3d 1099, 1101 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023)
Martin T. Neely appealed a judgment in a family law matter from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. The trial court adopted a proposed order verbat…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
No. 1D2025-1209
MARTIN T. NEELY, Former Husband,
Appellant,
v.
LINDSAY J. ENTREKIN, Former Wife,
Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. William F. Stone and John T. Brown, Judges.
May 13, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See King v. King, 363 So. 3d 1099, 1101 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023) (Holding that “a judgment need not be reversed solely because a trial court adopts a proposed order verbatim." Instead, there are various factors to be considered by an appellate court in determining whether a judgment reflects a trial judge's independent decision-making).
BILBREY, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Neely v. Entrekin (Fla. 1st DCA 2026)
-
Shamy v. Shovel Ready Projects, LLC (Fla. 4th DCA 2026)
-
Shopping Ctr. Interest, LLC v. TAB 250, Ltd. (Fla. 4th DCA 2026)
Authorities Cited
- Neely v. Entrekin (Fla. 1st DCA 2026)