K.K.J., A CHILD
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court must provide a well-reasoned and complete analysis identifying significant information overlooked or misconstrued by the Department of Juvenile Justice before deviating from its placement recommendation.
[1] When a trial court deviates from a Department of Juvenile Justice placement recommendation, it must provide a well-reasoned and complete analysis of the predisposition re…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“In order to deviate lawfully, a trial court must do more than place generalized reasons on the record; it must engage in a well-reasoned and complete analysis of the [predisposition report] and the type of facility to which the trial court intends to send the child.”
Court citing M.H. v. State, 69 So. 3d 325, 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
K.K.J., a minor, pled no contest to grand theft of a firearm and possession of a firearm by a minor. The trial court committed her to a high-risk resi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
K.K.J., a child, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 1D2025-1956
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Susanne Wilson Bullard, Judge.
April 29, 2026
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, K.K.J., challenges the trial court's order committing her to a high-risk residential commitment program after she pled no contest to grand theft of a firearm and possession of a firearm by a minor. Appellant argues, and we agree, that the trial court failed to comply with the requirements of section 985.433(7)(b), Florida Statutes, as interpreted in E.A.R. v. State, 4 So. 3d 614 (Fla. 2009), when it departed from the Department of Juvenile Justice's recommended placement within a moderate-risk program. Specifically, the trial court did not provide a “legally sufficient foundation” for disregarding the Department's recommendation "by identifying significant information that the Department has overlooked, failed to sufficiently consider, or misconstrued" as to Appellant's needs and the public risk she
poses. Id. at 638. The trial court's generalized conclusions are insufficient to disregard the Department's recommendation. See M.H. v. State, 69 So. 3d 325, 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (“In order to deviate lawfully, a trial court must do more than place generalized reasons on the record; it must engage in a well-reasoned and complete analysis of the [predisposition report] and the type of facility to which the trial court intends to send the child.”); J.W.B. v. State, So. 3d , 2026 WL 816515 at *1 (Fla. 1st DCA, March 25, 2026) (same).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand the disposition order for the trial court to provide sufficient reasons for deviating from the Department's recommendation or, in the alternative, to impose the Department's recommendation. State v. J. J., 359 So. 3d 863, 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 2023); С.М.Н. v. State, 25 So. 3d 678, 680 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
OSTERHAUS, C.J., and LEWIS and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- M.H. v. State, 69 So. 3d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
- C.M.H. v. State, 25 So. 3d 678 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
- J.W.B., IV v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2026)