KEITH A. HALPERN
v.
NIKOLETA G. KOIKOS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellate court must affirm an injunction when the appellant fails to supplement the record with a transcript or stipulated statement of evidence after being ordered to do so, preventing meaningful appellate review.
[1] When an appellant fails to supplement the record with a transcript of the hearing or a stipulated statement of evidence after the appellate court orders such supplementat…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceKeith A. Halpern was issued an injunction against domestic violence by the Circuit Court for Leon County on January 26, 2017, following a final hearin…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Supplementing The Record cases and more on FLexlaw
October 31, 2018 PER CURIAM. Appellant challenges the injunction against domestic violence entered January 26, 2017, after the final hearing held that same date. Appellant argues that the injunction was not supported by competent substantial evidence. However, after our order allowing Appellant to supplement the record with a transcript of the hearing or stipulated statement of the evidence, he did not do so. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.200(b)(4), (f)(2). Accordingly, we must affirm. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979); Murphy v. Blubaugh, --- So. 3d ---, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D1712, 2018 WL 3636747 (Fla. 2d DCA Aug. 1, 2018); Jackson v. Echols, 937 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Ricketts v. Ricketts, 790 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Ain v. Ain, 778 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
AFFIRMED. WETHERELL, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Keith A. Halpern, pro se, Appellant. No appearance, for Appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kandi Crosier v. Crosier (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
- Jackson v. Ladon Echols, 937 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
- Maurelle S. AIN v. AIN, 778 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
- Ricketts v. Ricketts, 790 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
- Murphy v. Kande K. Blubaugh, 252 So. 3d 809 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)