MAURELLE S. AIN, APPELLANT,
v.
CLIFFORD B. AIN, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed a temporary injunction prohibiting the mother from moving with her children, finding no reversible error.
The father obtained a temporary injunction against the mother moving with their children, following a hearing with short notice to the mother. The mot…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Notice Of Hearing cases and more on FLexlaw
KLEIN, J.
We affirm a temporary injunction prohibiting appellant and her three minor children from moving to Virginia without a prior court order. The injunction was entered based on an emergency motion filed by the appellee father, following a hearing which took place three hours after the mother’s counsel received notice. The mother was unable to attend, and her counsel participated by telephone.
The mother argues that she had insufficient notice of the hearing and that the injunction was not based on competent evidence. If the mother was serious about sufficient notice, surely she would have moved to dissolve the injunction. Such a motion would have entitled her to be heard within five days. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.610(d). Instead of seeking that relief, however, she simply filed her notice of appeal twenty days after the injunction was entered. As to the mother’s claim that there was insufficient evidence, we cannot address that because the record contains no transcript of the hearing. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1979).
The mother also argues that the injunction must be reversed because it does not contain any factual findings, citing non-family law cases, such as City of Dania Beach v. Konschnik, 763 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). We conclude that findings of fact were not required for the order entered in this case. First, the reasons why the family law judge temporarily enjoined the removal of children to another state, pending further order of court, are obvious, and findings of fact, which are normally required to facilitate appellate review, are unnecessary here. We would also note that the family law forms contained in Form 12.941, Florida Rules of Family Procedure, do not require findings of fact for temporary injunctions to prevent the removal of children.
We therefore affirm.
WARNER, C.J., and FARMER, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ricketts v. Ricketts, 790 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…from contacting her ex-husband. The record on appeal contains no transcript of the hearing held on the permanent injunction. Without a transcript of the hearing, this court cannot assess whether error was committed by the trial court. Ain v. Ain, 778 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). AFFIRMED. THOMPSON, C.J., and PETERSON, J., concur.…
-
Murphy v. Kande K. Blubaugh, 252 So. 3d 809 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)
-
Halpern v. Nikoleta G. Koikos, 255 So. 3d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)…50 (Fla. 1979); Murphy v. Blubaugh, --- So. 3d ---, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D1712, 2018 WL 3636747 (Fla. 2d DCA Aug. 1, 2018); Jackson v. Echols, 937 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Ricketts v. Ricketts, 790 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Ain v. Ain, 778 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). 2 AFFIRMED. WETHERELL, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _______…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
- City OF Dania Beach v. Konschnik, 763 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)