HARRY F. MCCRAY, JR.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Graham v. Florida does not apply to an 18-year-old defendant regardless of the defendant's juvenile mental and emotional development.
[1] Graham v. …
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceHarry F. McCray, Jr., was convicted in Columbia County Circuit Court. McCray appealed, apparently raising a Graham v. Florida claim.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
July 11, 2018 PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Romero v. State, 105 So. 3d 550, 552-54 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (holding that Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010), does not apply to an 18-year-old defendant, notwithstanding the juvenile nature of the defendant’s mental and emotional development), rev. denied, 131 So. 3d 789 (Fla. 2013).
WETHERELL, ROWE, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Harry F. McCray, Jr., pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McCray v. State, 247 So. 3d 721 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)…So. 3d 550, 552-54 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (holding that Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010), does not apply to an 18-year-old defendant, notwithstanding the juvenile nature of the defendant’s mental and emotional development), rev. denied, 131 So. 3d 789 (Fla. 2013). WETHERELL, ROWE, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. 2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Harry F…
-
Lomax v. Taylor, 149 So. 3d 1135 (Fla. 2014)…1057 (Fla.2013) (table) (petition for review dismissed); Lomax v. Ruvin, 129 So. 3d 1068 (Fla.2013) (table) (mandamus dismissed); Lomax v. James, No. SC13-1985 (Fla. Nov. 7, 2013) (notice of appeal transferred); Lomax v. Citrus Health Network, Inc., 131 So. 3d 789 (Fla.2013) (table) (mandamus denied); Lomax v. The City of Hialeah Gardens, 133 So. 3d 527 (Fla.2014) (table) (petition for review dismissed); Lomax v. City of Hialeah Gardens, 133 So. 3d 527 (Fla.2014) (table) (petition for review dismissed); Lomax…
Authorities Cited
- Graham v. Florida (1st Cir. 2010)
- Romero v. State, 105 So. 3d 550 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
- Octavius Walker v. State, 105 So. 3d 550 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)
- McCray v. State, 247 So. 3d 721 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)