STEVE BYLE, PETITIONER,
v.
PASCO COUNTY, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, AND MID-PENINSULA REALTY INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a single judge cannot decide a petition for review of administrative action when a local rule requires a three-judge panel.
[1] A circuit court's second-tier certiorari review is limited to determining whether the lower court provided procedural due process and departed from the essential requirem…
[2] When a local rule requires petitions to be heard by a three-judge panel, a single judge may not decide the merits of the petition.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSteve Byle petitioned the circuit court for certiorari review of a county board's approval of a site plan and variance. The circuit court dismissed hi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Second Tier Certiorari Review cases and more on FLexlaw
KELLY, Judge.
Steve Byle petitioned the circuit court to review by certiorari the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners’ approval of a preliminary site plan and variance request application. The circuit court dismissed his petition for lack of standing. Byle petitions this court to review by second-tier certiorari the circuit court’s order. This court’s second-tier review is limited to determining whether the circuit court provided Byle with procedural due process and whether it departed from the essential requirements of law. See Dusseau v. Metro. Dade County Bd. of County Comm’rs, 794 So. 2d 1270 (Fla.2001).
Byle argues that the circuit court did not provide him with procedural due process because a single judge rather than a three-judge panel disposed of his petition. Local Rule 1(A)(1) of the Sixth Judicial Circuit requires that appeals to the Sixth Circuit Court from designated administrative bodies of Pinellas and Pasco Counties be assigned to three-judge panels in the appellate division. Sixth Judicial Circuit Administrative Order No. 2007-016 PA/PI-CIR further clarifies that “[a]ll civil and criminal cases invoking the appellate jurisdiction of the Circuit Court pursuant to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 9.030(c), including ... petitions to review administrative action ... shall be heard by three-judge panels.”
As Byle correctly notes, when a circuit court adopts a local rule requiring that petitions be heard by three-judge panels, a single judge may not decide the merits of the petition. See McAlevy v. State, 947 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Melkonian v. Goldman, 647 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Because the Sixth Judicial Circuit has promulgated a rule requiring three-judge panels to decide petitions seeking review of administrative action, Byle was deprived of procedural due process when a single judge ruled on his petition. See McAlevy, 947 So. 2d at 528. Accordingly, we grant the petition for certiorari and quash the order under review.
Petition for certiorari granted.
WHATLEY and SILBERMAN, JJ„ Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Dusseau v. Metro. Dade Cnty. Bd. OF Cnty. Comm'rs, 794 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. 2001)
- McALEVY v. State, 947 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
- Melkonian v. Hon. Murray Goldman, 647 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)