ROBERT A. SURDAKOWSKI, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
ROBERT A. SURDAKOWSKI, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
957 So. 2d 661
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(4)(A).
DAVIS, PADOVANO, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pineiro v. Rigoberto Pineiro & Law Firm of Franklin & Criscuolo, 988 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)…ordered the wife not to dispose of her GE stock options, it was not for the purpose of protecting her counsels’ attorneys’ fees. Indeed the court did not have the authority to freeze her assets in order to pay her own attorneys. Rinkor v. Brborich, 957 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Levinson v. Levinson, 895 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Widom v. Widom, 679 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Nor, as appellant points out, can the contempt power of a court be invoked for the “settlement of property rights as opp…