JOHNNY R. STANFORD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2004-09-24
No. 2D04-2345
CASANUEVA, SALCINES, and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.
884 So. 2d 400 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Terry v. State, 808 So. 2d 1249 (Fla.2002); McCall v. State, 862 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); O’Neal v. State, 862 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Cook v. State, 816 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Shaw v. State, 780 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

As this court did in McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 2003 WL 21697171, 884 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA July 23, 2003), supplemented on rehearing, 884 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan.14, 2004).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

CASANUEVA, SALCINES, and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Michael J. Kinney, M.D. v. R.H. Halt Assocs., Inc., 927 So. 2d 920 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
    …s’ further motion. Dr. Kinney did not pay; the defendants’ moved to dismiss; and the court entered a final judgment of dismissal with prejudice. Dr. Kinney appealed the dismissal with prejudice to this court. In Kinney v. R.H. Halt & Assocs., Inc., 884 So. 2d 400, 402 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), we reversed and remanded for the trial court “to reconsider the motion to dismiss and, if appropriate, to make an explicit determination of whether Kinney willfully failed to comply with the April 2003 sanction orders.” Afte…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw