CARLOS MORAES, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF MIAMI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, HOMESTEAD CONCRETE & DRAINAGE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, F/K/A HOMESTEAD CONCRETE & DRYWALL, APPELLEES
CARLOS MORAES, APPELLANT,
CITY OF MIAMI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, HOMESTEAD CONCRETE & DRAINAGE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, F/K/A HOMESTEAD CONCRETE & DRYWALL, APPELLEES
827 So. 2d 1104
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
As the evidence is clear that the appel-lees had not taken physical possession of the work site and had not begun construction on it, the summary judgment is affirmed. See Verges v. Pacheco & Sons, Inc., 822 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Cruz v. Gables Colony, Ltd., 579 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Cruz v. Gables Colony Ltd., 579 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
- Tunsil v. State, 822 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
- Verges v. Pacheco & Sons, Inc., 822 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)