CHARLES TUNSIL, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CHARLES TUNSIL, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
822 So. 2d 542
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Having reviewed the entire record herein, we conclude that defendant should have been afforded the benefit of counsel at the evidentiary hearing on his motion for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for appointment of the public defender and a new hearing.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bechtel Corp. v. Batchelor, 250 So. 3d 187 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)…other possessor with authority or control), to use due care to warn or to exclude, licensees and invitees from areas known to the possessor to be dangerous because of operations or activities or conditions. See also Verges v. Pacheco & Sons, Inc., 822 So. 2d 542, 543 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (quoting Worth v. Eugene Gentile Builders, 697 So. 2d 945, 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) ). Moreover, Batchelor was not required to show that Bechtel had complete or exclusive control over the premises in order to establish Bechte…
-
Moraes v. City OF Miami, 827 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…PER CURIAM. As the evidence is clear that the appel-lees had not taken physical possession of the work site and had not begun construction on it, the summary judgment is affirmed. See Verges v. Pacheco & Sons, Inc., 822 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Cruz v. Gables Colony, Ltd., 579 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Affirmed.…