S.T., APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Parental Fitness cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See § 39.806(l)(f), Fla. Stat. (1999); Perry v. State, 776 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)(court may question witness in the interest of justice in quest for truth); J.M. v. Florida Dep’t of Children & Families, 762 So. 2d 1029, 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(court may terminate parental rights upon proof that “continuing involvement of the parent ... threatens the life, safety, well-being, or physical, mental, or emotional health of the child irrespective of the provision of services”)(quoting § 39.806(l)(c), Fla. Stat.); L.D. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 770 So. 2d 219, 220 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(case facts present “no plausible way that this case could come out other than to terminate the mother’s parental rights”); S.T. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 728 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(burden of proof to terminate parental rights met where children’s well-being and health had been repeatedly endangered in parent’s care).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- J.M. and A.S. v. Fla. Dep't of Child. & Families, 762 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
- L.D. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 770 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
- Perry v. State, 776 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
- S. T. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 728 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)