BILLY BRYANT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1999-10-27
No. 99-2357
WEBSTER, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.
744 So. 2d 550 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion without prejudice to appellant’s pursuing his claim of incorrect calculation of gain time credit before the Department of Corrections. See Green v. State, 698 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Slay v. Singletary, 676 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)(en banc), aff'd, 688 So. 2d 319 (Fla.1997); Duggan v. Department of Corrections, 665 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

WEBSTER, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gaynor v. State, 831 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
    …es within the Department of Corrections. See Tarrand v. State, 809 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (holding that rule 3.800(a) is not proper remedy where defendant raises issue which should be pursued through administrative remedies); Bryant v. State, 744 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (affirming the denial of a rule 3.800(a) motion which raised a gain time issue without prejudice to defendant to pursue administrative remedies). Defendant also asserts that a grand theft auto offense was improperly included on…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw