DENNIS BAILEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DENNIS BAILEY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
693 So. 2d 142
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1997)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence but strike the imposition of a public defender’s fee because notice was not given to the defendant of his right to challenge the amount of the fee as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1). See L.A.N. v. State, 675 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Fontenont v. State, 631 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). However, on remand, the fee may be reimposed after compliance with the rule. JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED; PUBLIC DEFENDER’S FEE STRICKEN; CAUSE REMANDED.
PETERSON, C.J., and W. SHARP and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Crawford v. State, 631 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)
- Peck v. DELTA Fire Sprinkler, Inc., 675 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
- L.A.N. v. State, 675 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)