L.A.N., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
L.A.N., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
675 So. 2d 711
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order of disposition placing L.A.N. on community control, but the condition requiring the child and the parents to repay Orange County $150 for the public defender’s fee is stricken, since the condition was not orally pronounced and notice was not given of the right to challenge the amount of the fee as required by the Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1). On remand, the fee may be reimposed after compliance with the rule.
DISPOSITION AFFIRMED; PUBLIC DEFENDER’S FEE STRICKEN; REMANDED.
DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ganceres v. Ganceres, 703 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)…lf of her contempt. We cannot know the facts upon which the trial judge based his decision because appellant has not brought us a transcript of the testimony, if such exists. We have no option but to affirm. See Peck v. Delta Fire Sprinkler, Inc., 675 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Haddad v. Cura, 674 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Sullivan v. Sullivan, 668 So. 2d 329 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). See also Bartolotta v. Bartolotta, 687 So. 2d 1385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). AFFIRMED. HARRIS and ANTOON, JJ., concur.…
-
Bailey v. State, 693 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…ction and sentence but strike the imposition of a public defender’s fee because notice was not given to the defendant of his right to challenge the amount of the fee as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1). See L.A.N. v. State, 675 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Fontenont v. State, 631 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). However, on remand, the fee may be reimposed after compliance with the rule. [*143] JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED; PUBLIC DEFENDER’S FEE STRICKEN; CAUSE REMANDED. PETERS…