JOHN RUSSO, PETITIONER,
v.
SERA-TEC BIOLOGICALS, INC., RESPONDENT
JOHN RUSSO, PETITIONER,
SERA-TEC BIOLOGICALS, INC., RESPONDENT
657 So. 2d 1159
Florida Supreme Court (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We review Russo v. Sera-Tec Biologicals, Inc., 650 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), in which the court affirmed on the basis of R.J. v. Humana of Florida, Inc., 625 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). We accepted jurisdiction because the Humana case was pending before this Court. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. See Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (Fla.1981). We have now decided the Humana case. R.J. v. Humana of Florida, Inc., 652 So. 2d 360 (Fla.1995). Accordingly, we remand this case for disposition consistent with Humana.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Russo v. Sera-Tec Biologicals, Inc., 657 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 1995)
Authorities Cited
- Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 1981)
- R.J. and P.J. v. Humana OF Fla., Inc., 652 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 1995)
- R.J. and P.J. v. Humana OF Fla., Inc., 625 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)
- Russo v. Sera-Tec Biologicals, Inc., 657 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 1995)