SYLVIA A. ROGERS, APPELLANT,
v.
CHRISTOPHER W. ROGERS, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1994-07-26
No. 92-2300
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and GODERICH, JJ.
639 So. 2d 1126 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Vena v. Vena, 556 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Gardner v. Gardner, 545 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Richardson v. Richardson, 442 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Whitney v. Whitney, 402 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); see Dinkel v. Dinkel, 322 So. 2d 22 (Fla.1975).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • RAY v. Elks Lodge # 1870 OF Stuart, 649 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
    …Procedure 1.140(c) is a very limited procedural device. The motion must be decided on the pleadings without reference to facts which may be properly considered under other procedural vehicles and without the aid of outside matters. Skubal v. Cooley, 639 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); McKinzie v. Hollywood, Inc., 421 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), petition for review denied, 431 So. 2d 989 (Fla.1983). A judgment on the pleadings should be granted only when the party is clearly entitled to a judgment as a mat…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw