MARK FELDMAN, APPELLANT,

v.

GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, INC., AMERICAN MOTORS SALES CORPORATION, RENAULT MOTORS, S.A. AND COLONIALO AMC/JEEP/RENAULT, INC., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Elliott Vasquez v. State, 778 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
  …e, 774 So. 2d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (holding two separate offenses occurred because they were separated by time and place); Nicholson v. State, 757 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Willis v. State, 640 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Sprow v. State, 639 So. 2d 992, 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (“[Because they occurred at different times, different places, and involved different victims, we conclude that the two burglary convictions did not arise out of a single criminal episode.”); Young v. State, 631 So. 2d 372 (F…
• Wright v. State, 834 So. 2d 879 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
  …a mere technical error. Because each of the four counts involved a separate victim and a separate crime date, it is permissible for the habitual offender sentences to run consecutively. Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521, 525 (Fla.1993); Sprow v. State, 639 So. 2d 992, 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). It is therefore appropriate to remand the case to the trial court to enter a corrected sentencing order such that one of the now-concurrent counts will be resen-tenced to provide instead for a consecutive period of ten-year…
• Zach Richman v. State, 793 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
  …imum sentences on account of the use of a firearm. We reject that argument as well. Defendant was convicted of armed burglary of two apartments in the same apartment building. Consecutive mandatory minimum sentences were permissible. Sprow v. State, 639 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Affirmed. . The crime date was July 28, 1998. . Chapter 95-184 was subsequently determined to violate the single subject rule. Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla.2000). Chapter 95-184 is thus invalid with respect to crimes co…

Authorities Cited

• Barrios v. Draper, 423 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)