DORSEY ADDREN SANDERS, III, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DORSEY ADDREN SANDERS, III, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
613 So. 2d 64
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
W. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ., concur. GRIFFIN, J., concurs specially, with opinion.
Concurrence
GRIFFIN, Judge,
concurring specially.
In my view, admission of the “wallet from heaven” was error; however, after reviewing the trial transcript, including closing arguments, I conclude the error does not warrant reversal.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dorsey A. Sanders, III v. State, 689 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…made by John Barrett violated the defendant’s rights of confrontation and cross-examination under the Florida and federal constitutions. This court affirmed per curiam the defendant’s convictions and sentences without opinion. See Sanders v. State, 613 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 5th DCA), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 924, 113 S.Ct. 3041, 125 L.Ed.2d 727 (1993). Co-defendant Burnside was tried separately on January 12, 1993, four days after the defendant’s convictions and sentences were affirmed. Burnside was found guilty,…
-
Sanders v. Moore, 156 F. Supp. 2d 1301 (M.D. Fla. 2001)…tement made by Barrett to a friend in Ohio where Barrett had fled immediately after the murders. The Petitioner’s appeal was denied and his conviction and sentence were affirmed by the Florida appellate court without opinion. Sanders v. State, 613 So.2d 64 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 924, 113 S.Ct. 3041, 125 L.Ed.2d 727 (1993). But when the same issue based on admission of the same evidence was subsequently raised in Burnside’s direct appeal, the same appellate court found error…