CITY OF MIAMI, SELF-INSURED, APPELLANT,
v.
MILTON OGLE, APPELLEE
CITY OF MIAMI, SELF-INSURED, APPELLANT,
MILTON OGLE, APPELLEE
600 So. 2d 31
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order on appeal for the reasons expressed in our opinion in City of Miami v. Burnett, 596 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
Appellee, the claimant below, has filed an amended motion for appellate attorney’s fees. In our discretion we grant the motion. We remand the matter to the judge of compensation claims to determine the amount of attorney’s fees. We note that this is another of the cases involving the City of Miami’s pension offset ordinance and the briefs which have been filed are largely duplicative of other work. We direct the JCC’s attention to that part of our opinion in Burnett which dealt with appellate attorney’s fees.
JOANOS, C.J., and BOOTH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City OF N. BAY Vill. & Ins. Servicing & Adjusting Co. v. Cook, 617 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
Authorities Cited
- City OF Miami v. Lucious E. Burnett, 596 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)