CLAUDE ROBINSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CLAUDE ROBINSON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
589 So. 2d 469
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1991)
Opinion of the Court
WIGGINTON, Judge.
Appellant’s conviction is affirmed but the sentencing order is remanded to the trial court with directions that the court either set the amount for the payment of the medical and counseling expenses of the victim or, if that amount is not yet determinable, provide a procedure for determining the amount and, at the appropriate time, set the amount. See King v. State, 546 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); McCaskill v. State, 520 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); and James v. State, 499 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
ERVIN and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- McCASKILL v. State, 520 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
- James v. State, 499 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
- Ira Louis King v. State, 546 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)