IRA LOUIS KING, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
IRA LOUIS KING, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
546 So. 2d 122
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
SHIVERS, Chief Judge.
The defendant appeals that part of his sentencing requirement that he pay restitution as outlined in the presentence investigation report as directed by the probation officer. Pursuant to our decision in James v. State, 499 So. 2d 24 (Pla. 1st DCA 1986) we affirm the probation order but remand to the trial court for a prompt hearing to establish the amount of restitution the defendant owes. We further adopt the caveat in James that appeals such as the instant one are frivolous where remedies are available before the trial court.
ERVIN and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Walls v. State, 609 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…e that the court nevertheless reversed and remanded for a restitution hearing. We also reverse and remand, but adopt the caveat in James that appeals on this issue are frivolous where remedies are available before the trial court. See King v. State, 546 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).…
-
Robinson v. State, 589 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…rt either set the amount for the payment of the medical and counseling expenses of the victim or, if that amount is not yet determinable, provide a procedure for determining the amount and, at the appropriate time, set the amount. See King v. State, 546 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); McCaskill v. State, 520 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); [*470] and James v. State, 499 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). ERVIN and WOLF, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- James v. State, 499 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)