WRIGHT
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND SHEILA SZALA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Walter Lee Wright petitioned for a writ of mandamus against the Florida Department of Corrections and Sheila Szala in original jurisdiction. The First District Court of Appeal dismissed the petition as moot because the trial court had already ruled on Wright's motion for relief from judgment.
The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot because the trial court ruled on the motion for relief from judgment, rendering the petition without practical effect.
[1] A petition for writ of mandamus becomes moot when the trial court has ruled on the underlying motion for relief from judgment, rendering the appellate relief sought unnec…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner's motion for relief from judgment, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.”
Establishes the basis for dismissal—that a ruling on the underlying motion rendered the mandamus petition moot.
Wright filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the appellate court's original jurisdiction. During the pendency of the petition, the trial court rule…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion For Relief From Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
WALTER LEE WRIGHT, Petitioner, v. No. 1D2025-2140
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SHEILA SZALA, Respondents.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
April 8, 2026
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner's motion for relief from judgment, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).
ROWE, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Walter Lee Wright, pro se, Petitioner. Marie A. Borland, Ethen R. Shapiro, and Jacob Z. Coates of Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A., Tampa, for Respondent Sheila Szala.
No appearance for Respondent Florida Department of Corrections.
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wright v. Fla. Dep't of Corr. & Sheila Szala (Fla. 1st DCA 2026)…tition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction. April 8, 2026 PER CURIAM. Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner's motion for relief from judgment, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024). ---PAGE 2--- ROWE, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. Walter Lee Wright, pro se, Petitioner. Marie A. Borland, Ethen R.…
-
Setts v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)
-
Davis v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2025)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Wright v. Fla. Dep't of Corr. & Sheila Szala (Fla. 1st DCA 2026)