TINA IZARD BOIS N/K/A
v.
PHILIPPE BOIS

Fla. 4th DCA | 2022-12-07
No. 2022-0348
290 So. 3d 158 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2022) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 351 So. 3d 40
Cited by 3 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

An order determining only entitlement to attorney's fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes, without fixing the amount, is nonfinal and nonappealable.


Headnotes

[1] An order determining only entitlement to attorney's fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes, without fixing the amount of the fee award, is nonfinal and not appealabl…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Appellant Tina Izard challenged two portions of a trial court's order, including the trial court's grant of appellee's motion for attorney's fees purs…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

CONNER, J.

Appellant challenges two portions of the trial court’s order on appeal. We dismiss as to appellant’s argument that the trial court erred in granting appellee’s motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2020). Because the trial court’s order determined only entitlement to attorney’s fees, that portion of the order is nonfinal and nonappealable. See Johnson Tr. of Krej Irrevocable Tr. No. 7 v. Cliché Piano Bar & Pool Lounge, LLC, 290 So. 3d 158, 159 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) (applying this rule to attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105). We affirm appellant’s remaining issue without discussion.

Dismissed in part, affirmed in part.

WARNER and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Russell v. Mells, 426 So. 3d 913 (Fla. 2d DCA 2025)
  • Bois v. Philippe Bois, 290 So. 3d 158 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022)
    …Florida Statutes (2020). Because the trial court’s order determined only entitlement to attorney’s fees, that portion of the order is nonfinal and nonappealable. See Johnson Tr. of Krej Irrevocable Tr. No. 7 v. Cliché Piano Bar & Pool Lounge, LLC, 290 So. 3d 158, 159 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) (applying this rule to attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105). We affirm appellant’s remaining issue without discussion. Dismissed in part, affirmed in part. WARNER and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw