THE PADRON LAW GROUP, P.L.L.C. AND ESTHER MEDINA HERNANDEZ,
v.
JUAN DIAZ VALDENEBRO, ETC.,

Fla. 3d DCA | 2020-07-15
No. 19-2219
45 Fla. L. Weekly D1276 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2020) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Topics

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Void Order cases and more on FLexlaw


Per_curiam
Per Curiam

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Williams v. Taylor, 45 Fla. L. Weekly D1276, D1276 (Fla. 3d DCA May 27, 2020) (analogizing Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540(b)(4) and Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.540(b)(4) and holding that neither affords relief from merely voidable judgments); Sanchez v. Sanchez, 285 So. 3d 969, 975 n.9 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (declining to find orders void under rules 1.540(b)(4) or 12.540(b)(4) merely because they were caused by trial court’s “mischaracteriz[ation]” that it lacked jurisdiction, when it “plainly had [it] to make [the] determinations [requested]”); Magaziner v. Magaziner, 434 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (affirming denial of appellant’s motion for relief where trial court’s judgment, though procedurally erroneous, “was merely error in the exercise of properly obtained jurisdiction”).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw