GONZALO LOPEZ-JORDAN,
v.
ARAGUANEY LTD.,
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court's factual determinations in a bench trial are affirmed on appeal when supported by competent, substantial evidence and do not constitute an abuse of discretion.
[1] In reviewing a judgment rendered after a bench trial, an appellate court must ensure that the trial court's findings of fact are supported by competent, substantial evide…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGonzalo Lopez-Jordan appealed a judgment rendered after a bench trial in Miami-Dade County involving Araguaney Ltd.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Competent Substantial Evidence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Sg 2901, LLC v. Complimenti, Inc., 323 So. 3d 804, 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (“We review a judgment rendered after a bench trial to ensure that the trial court’s findings of fact are supported by competent, substantial evidence.”) (quotations omitted); see also Zupnik Haverland, LLC v. Current Builders of Fla., Inc., 7 So. 3d 1132, 1134 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (“The lower court’s ultimate factual determinations during a non-jury trial may not be disturbed on appeal unless shown to be unsupported by competent and substantial evidence or to constitute an abuse of discretion.”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Gonzalo Lopez-Jordan v. Araguaney Ltd., 323 So. 3d 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Sg 2901, LLC v. Complimenti, Inc., 323 So. 3d 804, 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (“We review a judgment rendered after a bench trial to ensure that the trial court’s findings of fact are supported by competent, substantial evidence.”) (quotations omitted); see also Zupnik Haverland, LLC v. Current Builder…
-
Avant Design Grp., Inc. v. Aquastar Holdings, LLC, 351 So. 3d 62 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022)…contract interpretation issue as a fact issue, we are compelled to affirm the trial court’s factual findings unless the record is devoid of competent, substantial evidence supporting the trial court’s findings. SG 2901, LLC v. Complimenti, Inc., 323 So. 3d 804, 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021). As ample record evidence supports the trial court’s finding that the parties entered into a cost-plus contract that limited Aquastar’s payment obligation to the 20% Fee, we affirm the trial court’s principal conclusion re…
-
Parque Towers Developers, LLC v. Pilac Mgmt., Ltd., 395 So. 3d 189 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)…rneys’ fees and costs. These appeals followed. ANALYSIS We review a judgment entered after a nonjury trial to ensure the trial court’s factual findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence. See, e.g., Sg 2901, LLC v. Complimenti, Inc., 323 So. 3d 804, 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021). The trial court’s interpretation of a contract is a matter of law reviewed de novo. See, e.g., Charbonier Food Servs., LLC v. 121 Alhambra Tower, LLC, 206 So. 3d 755, 758 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). Where a contract is clear and…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Zupnik Haverland, L.L.C. v. Current Builders OF Fla., Inc., 7 So. 3d 1132 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
- Gonzalo Lopez-Jordan v. Araguaney Ltd., 323 So. 3d 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)