BENJAMIN
v.
WAYNE DALTON SALES CENTER

N.D. Fla. | 2023-02-13
No. 3:23cv865
2021 WL 1680211 District Court, N.D. Florida (2023) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A motion for summary judgment is premature if filed before service and discovery have occurred.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a motion for summary judgment shortly after initiating the lawsuit. Service had not been completed, no answer was …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff filed this pro se case on January 18, 2023. On February 1, 2023, Plaintiff moved for summary judgment. (Doc. 8). This litigation is in its infancy. Service has not occurred. No answer has been filed. Discovery has not started. Thus, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is premature. See, e.g., Shockey v. Allen, No. 6:19-cv-87, 2021 WL 1680211, at *1 (S.D. Ga. Apr. 5, 2021) (denying motion for summary judgment as premature where it was filed before service and discovery); Ferguson v. DeStefano, No. 10-80285, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122969, at *4 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 2, 2010) (holding a motion for summary judgment was premature when it was filed before the defendant had an opportunity to complete discovery). If this case reaches the summary judgment stage, the Court will provide Plaintiff with a deadline for filing a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be DENIED without prejudice as premature. At Pensacola, Florida, this the 13th day of February 2023.

/s/Zachary C. Bolitho Zachary C. Bolitho United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of the report and recommendation. Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only and does not control. An objecting party must serve a copy of its objections upon all other parties. A party who fails to object to the magistrate judge’s findings or recommendations contained in a report and recommendation waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court’s order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Benjamin v. Wayne Dalton Sales Ctr., 2021 WL 1680211 (N.D. Fla. 2023)
    …mmary judgment. (Doc. 8). This litigation is in its infancy. Service has not occurred. No answer has been filed. Discovery has not started. Thus, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is premature. See, e.g., Shockey v. Allen, No. 6:19-cv-87, 2021 WL 1680211, at *1 (S.D. Ga. Apr. 5, 2021) (denying motion for summary judgment as premature where it was filed before service and discovery); Ferguson v. DeStefano, No. 10-80285, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122969, at *4 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 2, 2010) (holding a motion f…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw