MAERSK LINE A/S
v.
HARIBO FOOD 2004, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Plaintiff's motion for final judgment in garnishment should be granted.
Plaintiff obtained a default final judgment against defendants. Plaintiff then sought a final judgment in garnishment against Garnishee FirstBank Flor…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Report And Recommendation cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter is before the Court’s on Maersk Line A/S’s (“Plaintiff”) second motion for final judgment against Garnishee FirstBank Florida in the amount of $4,387.951 as set forth in the Garnishee’s answer to the writs of garnishment. [D.E. 65]. No timely response was filed in opposition to the motion.2 Therefore, Plaintiff’s
shall bar the parties from de novo determination by the District Judge of any factual or legal issue covered in the Report and shall bar the parties from challenging on appeal the District Judge’s Order based on any unobjected-to factual or legal conclusions included in the Report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; see, e.g., Patton v. Rowell, 2017 WL 443634 (11th Cir. Feb.2, 2017); Cooley v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 2016 WL 7321208 (11th Cir. Dec. 16, 2016).
DONE AND SUBMITTED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 27th day of September, 2021.
/s/ Edwin G. Torres
EDWIN G. TORRES
United States Magistrate Judge
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (25 total)
-
Maersk Line A/S v. Haribo Food 2004, Inc., 2017 WL 443634 (S.D. Fla. 2021)…t Judge’s Order based on any unobjected-to factual or legal conclusions included in the Report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; see, e.g., Patton v. Rowell, 2017 WL 443634 (11th Cir. Feb. 2, 2017); Cooley v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 2016 WL 7321208 (11th Cir. Dec. 16, 2016). DONE AND SUBMITTED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 27th day of September, 2021. /s/ Edwin G. Torres EDWIN G. TORRES United States Magistrate Judge 3 The Court should reserve jurisdiction to enter all further orde…1 / 2
-
Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (S.D. Fla. 2025)…red in the Report and shall bar the parties from challenging on appeal the District Judge's Order based on any unobjected-to factual or legal conclusions included in the Report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; see, e.g., Patton v. Rowell, 2017 WL 443634 (11th Cir. Feb. 2, 2017); Cooley v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2016 WL 7321208 (11th Cir. Dec. 16, 2016). ---PAGE 6--- 6 Case 1:19-cv-20896-RNS Document 964 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2025 Page 7 of 7 DONE and SUBMITTED in Chambers at Miam…1 / 2
-
Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (S.D. Fla. 2025)…Judge's Order based on any unobjected-to factual or legal conclusions included in the Report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; see, e.g., Patton v. Rowell, 2017 WL 443634 (11th Cir. Feb. 2, 2017); Cooley v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2016 WL 7321208 (11th Cir. Dec. 16, 2016). DONE and SUBMITTED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 27th day of August, 2025. /s/ Edwin G. Torres EDWIN G. TORRES United States Magistrate Judge ---PAGE 7--- 1 On July 23, 2025, the Honorable Robert N. Scola referre…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 25 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Maersk Line A/S v. Haribo Food 2004, Inc., 2017 WL 443634 (S.D. Fla. 2021)