BEHAVIOR ANALYST CERTIFICATION BOARD, INC.
v.
PELAEZ ELVIREZ

S.D. Fla. | 2023-03-30
No. 21-cv-22833
2009 WL 3200681 District Court, S.D. Florida (2023) Positive Treatment
Cited by 15 cases
Opinion of the Court

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff Behavior Analyst Certification Board Inc.’s (“Plaintiff”) Bill of Costs and Memorandum of Law in Support of Bill of Costs. ECF Nos. - (collectively “Motion for Bill of Costs” or “Motion”).

Therein, Plaintiff seeks $402.00 in taxable costs as the prevailing party in this case. ECF No. at 2 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1920).

The $402.00 requested is the amount of the filing fee. Id.; see also ECF No. at 5. After a review of the materials submitted by Plaintiff, the Court finds that the requested costs are reasonable and recoverable. See Goodman v. Sperduti Enterps., Inc., No. 08-62096-CIV, 2009 WL 3200681, at *3 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 6, 2009) (“There is no question that Plaintiff is entitled to the cost of the filing fee because it falls into one of the categories of reimbursable costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920[.]”).

Therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to recover $402.00 in taxable costs.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion, ECF Nos. -, is GRANTED. Case No. 21-cv-21873-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

2. Plaintiff is entitled to $402.00 in taxable costs from Defendant Marta Pelaez Elvirez. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on March 30, 2023.

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: Counsel of Record

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

  • Behavior Analyst Certification Bd., Inc. v. Pelaez Elvirez, 2009 WL 3200681 (S.D. Fla. 2023)
    …the amount of the filing fee. Id.; see also ECF No. [56] at 5. After a review of the materials submitted by Plaintiff, the Court finds that the requested costs are reasonable and recoverable. See Goodman v. Sperduti Enterps., Inc., No. 08-62096-CIV, 2009 WL 3200681, at *3 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 6, 2009) (“There is no question that Plaintiff is entitled to the cost of the filing fee because it falls into one of the categories of reimbursable costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920[.]”). Therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to recove…
  • Lakhani v. 900 Sw., LLC (S.D. Fla. 2023)
    …d.” Mathews v. Crosby, 480 F. 3d 1265, 1277 (11th Cir. 2007). After a review of the materials submitted by Plaintiff, the Court finds that the requested costs are reasonable and recoverable. See Goodman v. Sperduti Enterps., Inc., No. 08-62096-CIV, 2009 WL 3200681, at *3 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 6, 2009) (“There is no question that Plaintiff is entitled to the cost of the filing fee because it falls into one of the categories of re1mbursable costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920[.]”); EEOC v. W&O, Inc., 213 F. 3d 600, 623 (11t…
  • Ariza v. Casablanco Mattress & Furniture Gallery, LLC. (S.D. Fla. 2023)
    …, 480 F. 3d 1265, 1277 (11th Cir. 2007). Based upon a review of the materials submitted by Plaintiff, the Court finds that the requested costs and expert fees are reasonable and recoverable. See Goodman v. Sperduti Enterps., Inc., No. 08-62096-CIV, 2009 WL 3200681, at *3 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 6, 2009) (“There is no question that Plaintiff is entitled to the cost of the filing fee because it falls into one of the categories of reimbursable costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920[.]”); EEOC v. W&O, Inc., 213 F. 3d 600, 623 (11t…

Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw