STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
v.
JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 71.132.178.43
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A district court granted a copyright holder's motion to serve a third-party subpoena on an Internet Service Provider (ISP) before the Rule 26(f) conference to obtain subscriber information linked to an alleged copyright infringement. The court found good cause for early discovery and imposed conditions on the use and disclosure of the obtained information.
The court granted the motion, finding that good cause existed for early service of a Rule 45 subpoena on the ISP. The plaintiff may obtain the subscriber's true name and address, subject to the conditions that the ISP notify the subscriber via certified mail and that the information be used only to protect and enforce the plaintiff's rights in the complaint.
[1] Good cause must be established for a party to serve a third-party subpoena on an ISP prior to a Rule 26(f) conference.
[2] A court may grant leave for a party to serve a Rule 45 subpoena on an ISP to obtain the identity and address of a subscriber assigned a specific IP address.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Plaintiff established that "good cause" exists for it to serve a third-party subpoena on AT&T Internet (hereinafter the "ISP").”
The court's finding that the plaintiff met the legal standard for early discovery of subscriber information.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePlaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC sought early discovery of subscriber information from AT&T Internet to identify a defendant associated with IP addres…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rule 45 Subpoena cases and more on FLexlaw
TO SERVE A THIRD PARTY SUBPOENA PRIOR TO A RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Leave for Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference (the “Motion”). [ECF No. 6]. The Court has reviewed the Motion and the record and is otherwise fully advised. Based thereon, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. Plaintiff established that “good cause” exists for it to serve a third-party subpoena on AT&T Internet (hereinafter the “ISP”). See e.g., Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Doe, No. CV 15- 1987-ORL-40TBS, 2015 WL 1293850, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 3, 2015); Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, No. CV 15-2314-T-17TBM, 2015 WL 12856086, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 6, 2015).
2. Plaintiff may serve the ISP with a Rule 45 subpoena commanding the ISP to provide Plaintiff with the true name and address of the Defendant to whom the ISP assigned an IP
address as set forth on Exhibit A to the Complaint. Plaintiff shall attach to any such subpoena a copy of this Order.
3. If the ISP qualifies as a “cable operator,” [fn 1] it shall comply with 47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2)(B) [fn 2] by sending a copy of this Order to the Defendant.
4. Plaintiff may only use the information disclosed in response to a Rule 45 subpoena served on the ISP for the purpose of protecting and enforcing Plaintiff's rights as set forth in its Complaint.
5. To ensure "the subscriber is notified of such [an] order," 47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2)(B), the ISP shall, via certified mail, send notice to the subscriber which includes a copy of this Order. The ISP shall notify Plaintiff, in writing, of the date on which the notification was mailed to the subscriber. In the event the ISP fails to notify Plaintiff that it has complied with this provision, Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on the subscriber simultaneous to or before any other service.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this Wednesday, October 23, 2024
DARRIN P. GAYLES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
[fn 1]: "The term 'cable operator' means any person or group of persons (A) who provides cable service over a cable system and directly or through one or more affiliates owns a significant interest in such cable system, or (B) who otherwise controls or is responsible for, through any arrangement, the management and operation of such a cable system." 47 U.S.C. § 522(5).
[fn 2]: "A cable operator may disclose such [personal identifying] information if the disclosure is . . . made pursuant to a court order authorizing such disclosure, if the subscriber is notified of such order by the person to whom the order is directed." 47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2)(B).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 71.132.178.43, 2015 WL 1293850 (S.D. Fla. 2024)…thereon, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Plaintiff established that “good cause” exists for it to serve a third-party subpoena on AT&T Internet (hereinafter the “ISP”). See e.g., Clear Skies Nevada, LLC v. Doe, No. CV 15- 1987-ORL-40TBS, 2015 WL 1293850, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 3, 2015); Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, No. CV 15-2314-T-17TBM, 2015 WL 12856086, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 6, 2015). 2. Plaintiff may serve the ISP with a Rule 45 subpoena commanding the ISP to provide Plaintiff with the true name a…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 71.150.140.167 (M.D. Fla. 2024)
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 71.132.178.43, 2015 WL 1293850 (S.D. Fla. 2024)