ANTHONY J. ROBERTS
v.
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The district court reviewed a magistrate judge's report and recommendation on Progressive Casualty Insurance Company's motion to compel arbitration in a dispute with Anthony J. Roberts. The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation in full, granted the motion to compel arbitration, and stayed the litigation pending completion of arbitration proceedings.
The district court affirmed and adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation in full, granted the defendant's motion to compel arbitration, and stayed the case pending the final outcome of arbitration as required by 9 U.S.C. § 3.
[1] A district court reviews a magistrate judge's report and recommendation de novo when a party timely objects to it.
[2] A party objecting to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation must clearly advise the district court and pinpoint the specific findings with which the party disagre…
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“When a magistrate judge's report and recommendation is timely objected to, the district court reviews the objected-to portions of the report and recommendation de novo.”
Establishes the standard of review applied by the district court to the magistrate judge's recommendations.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAnthony J. Roberts filed suit against Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. The defendant filed a motion to compel arbitration. A magistrate judge i…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Objections To Report And Recommendation cases and more on FLexlaw
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe's Report and Recommendation on the Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration (“Report”), entered on September 26, 2025. [ECF No. 14]. The plaintiff objects to the Report pursuant to Rule 72(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [ECF No. 27]. Therein, the plaintiff lodges four objections with various sub-objections. [ECF No. 27]. The defendant opposed the objections to the Report. [ECF No. 28]. When a magistrate judge's report and recommendation is timely objected to, the district court reviews the objected-to portions of the report and recommendation de novo. Wade v. Dep't of Veteran Affs., Case No. 23-cv-20186, 2023 WL 4228182 at *1 (S.D. Fla. June 28, 2023). A party lodging an objection to a report and recommendation “must clearly advise the district court and pinpoint the specific findings that the party disagrees with.” U.S. v. Schultz, 565 F. 3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009).
The Court has thus reviewed the Report de novo and is in full agreement with Judge McCabe's comprehensive analysis and recommendations.
It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The Report [ECF No. 14] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 2. Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration [ECF No. 9] is GRANTED. To the extent
the plaintiff wishes to pursue his claims against the defendant, he must pursue those claims with the appropriate arbitration forum.
3. This case is STAYED pending the final outcome of arbitration as required by 9 U.S.C. § 3.
4. The Clerk SHALL FILE a Notice of Compliance on the docket that a copy of this Order was mailed to the plaintiff.
DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Florida, this 22nd day of December, 2025.
Cod Antar ED ARTAU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CC: Anthony J. Roberts 6075 Stonecrest Ct.
West Palm Beach, FL 33415 PRO SE
Erin Michelle Sales 200 South Orange Avenue Suite 2300 Orlando, FL 32801 4076494020 Email: [email protected]
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Roberts v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 2023 WL 4228182 (S.D. Fla. 2025)…the Report. [ECF No. 28]. When a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is timely objected to, the district court reviews the objected-to portions of the report and recommendation de novo. Wade v. Dep’t of Veteran Affs., Case No. 23-cv-20186, 2023 WL 4228182 at *1 (S.D. Fla. June 28, 2023). A party lodging an objection to a report and recommendation “must clearly advise the district court and pinpoint the specific findings that the party disagrees with.” U.S. v. Schultz, 565 F. 3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir…
-
Anglin v. Northpark at Scott Carver Apts. (S.D. Fla. 2024)…ted, see Complaint at 6, we surmise that she wants us to do something about her eviction. But we have no idea why she was evicted or what role (if any) Northpark played in that process. And that's not good enough. See Wade v. Dep't of Veteran Affs., 2023 WL 4228182, at *3 (S.D. Fla. June 28, 2023) (Altman, J.) (dismissing a complaint that left the court with “no idea how the Defendants harmed the Plaintiff or why they should be liable to him"). As for FED. R. CIV. P. 10(b), the Complaint doesn't present infor…
-
Anglin v. ChildNet (S.D. Fla. 2024)…, see Amended Complaint at 6, 11, we surmise that she wants us to do something about her son. But we have no idea where her son is, why he was taken from her, or who has custody of him. And that's not good enough. See Wade v. Dep't of Veteran Affs., 2023 WL 4228182, at *3 (S.D. Fla. June 28, 2023) (Altman, J.) (dismissing a complaint that left the court with “no idea how the Defendants harmed the Plaintiff or why they should be liable to him”). As for FED. R. CIV. P. 10(b), the Amended Complaint's paragraphs a…
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353 (11th Cir. 2009)
- Roberts v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 2023 WL 4228182 (S.D. Fla. 2025)