SHILOH CHRISTIAN CENTER
v.
ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

M.D. Fla. | 2023-05-12
No. 55
2020 WL 1433052 District Court, M.D. Florida (2023) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 2010 WL 3042822
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court denied the motion for attorney's fees and costs without prejudice.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff filed a motion for attorney's fees and costs and to charge a lien. The motion failed to comply with local rules and improperly combined requ…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

LIEN (Doc. No. 55) FILED: May 11, 2023

THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice. The motion fails to comply with the Local Rules, including Local Rules 3.01(g) and 7.01(b). The motion also improperly combines requests for two different forms of affirmative relief into one motion. See, e.g., Collins v. Bereczki, No. 8:19-cv- 162-T-24]SS, 2020 WL 1433052, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 24, 2020) (“It is not proper to combine requests for two different forms of relief into one motion. . . .”); Est. of Coleman v. Scott, No. 2:10-cv-105-FtM-36SPC, 2010 WL 3042822, at *1 (M.D. Fla. July 30, 2010) (“Each separate request for relief should be set forth in separate motions.

Any renewed motion(s) must fully comply with all Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rules, and Court Orders. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on May 12, 2023.

LESLIE 3 AN PRICE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Shiloh Christian Ctr. v. Aspen Specialty Ins. Co., 2020 WL 1433052 (M.D. Fla. 2023)
    …fails to comply with the Local Rules, including Local Rules 3.01(g) and 7.01(b). The motion also improperly combines requests for two different forms of affirmative relief into one motion. See, e.g., Collins v. Bereczki, No. 8:19-cv- 162-T-24]SS, 2020 WL 1433052, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 24, 2020) (“It is not proper to combine requests for two different forms of relief into one motion. . . .”); Est. of Coleman v. Scott, No. 2:10-cv-105-FtM-36SPC, 2010 WL 3042822, at *1 (M.D. Fla. July 30, 2010) (“Each s…
    1 / 2
  • …., Collins v. Bereczki, No. 8:19-cv-162-T-24JSS, 2020 WL 1433052, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 24, 2020) (“It is not proper to combine requests for two different forms of relief into one motion. . . .”); Est. of Coleman v. Scott, No. 2:10-cv-105-FtM-36SPC, 2010 WL 3042822, at *1 (M.D. Fla. July 30, 2010) (“Each separate request for relief should be set forth in separate motions. . . .”). Accordingly, to the extent that Defendant requests involuntary dismissal for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with Court Ord…
    1 / 3

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw