ATRIA HOLDINGS, S.A.
v.
ATLANTIC FUNDING CAPITAL CORP.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Atria Holdings sought entry of clerk's default against three defendants for failure to plead or defend. The court denied the motions without prejudice because Atria failed to establish proper service of process, specifically failing to justify or explain why substitute service via the Florida Secretary of State was appropriate under applicable statutory provisions.
The court denied Atria's motions for entry of clerk's default without prejudice because Atria failed to establish that the defendants were properly served and failed to justify why substitute service via the Florida Secretary of State was appropriate. The court noted that while Florida Statutes §§ 48.181 and 48.161 provide for such substitute service when a party is concealing its whereabouts, Atria neither cited these provisions nor claimed the defendants were concealing their whereabouts.
[1] A party seeking a clerk's default must establish that the defaulting party was properly served.
[2] Valid substituted service on the Florida Secretary of State requires strict compliance with statutory provisions.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“before a clerk's default can be entered, the serving party must establish that the defaulting party was properly served”
Establishes the prerequisite requirement for obtaining clerk's default that Atria failed to meet
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAtria Holdings filed motions for entry of clerk's default against Luis Hernandez, Abel Carbajal, and Samax, LLC. The plaintiff claimed to have made va…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Proper Service Of Process cases and more on FLexlaw
Plaintiff has filed motions for entry of clerk's default against three defendants-Luis Hernandez (Doc. 247), Abel Carbajal (Doc. 248), and Samax, LLC (Doc. 249).
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 55(a), “[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default.” However, before a clerk's default can be entered, the serving party must establish that the defaulting party was properly served. Laing v. Cordi, III, No. 2:11cv-566-FtM-29SPC, 2012 WL 4828312 at *1 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 10, 2012); Manheim Automotive Fin., Servs., Inc. v. Information Matrix Tech., Inc., No. 2:12-cv-360-FtM-29-SPC, 2012 WL 3947207 at *1 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 10, 2012).
Here, the motions and supporting affidavits (Docs. 236, 237, 246), detail the various unsuccessful attempts Plaintiff made to serve these Defendants. Plaintiff claims that it ultimately effected service on all three Defendants by serving the Florida Secretary of State. Plaintiff, however, fails to offer any explanation as to why substitute service of process was justified in this case. Indeed, while Florida Statutes §§ 48.181 and 48.161 provide a method
for effecting substitute process of service by serving the Florida Secretary of State when an individual or business entity is concealing its whereabouts, Plaintiff does not cite these statutory provisions, nor does it even claim that the Defendants are concealing their whereabouts. [fn 1] Thus, the Court is left to guess why Plaintiff believes substituted service was properly effected.
Accordingly, Plaintiff's motions for entry of clerk's default are due to be denied without prejudice (Docs. 247, 248, 249). If Plaintiff chooses to refile these motions, it is cautioned that valid substituted service on the Secretary of State requires strict compliance with the statutory provisions. Chacon v. SW Florida Services, Inc., No. 2:24-cv-415-JLB-NPM, 2025 WL 807026, at *2 (M.D. Fla. March 13, 2025).
DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on March 27, 2025.
PHILIP R. LAMMENS United States Magistrate Judge
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties
[fn 1]: The supporting affidavits cite solely to Florida Statute §48.151(2) (Doc. 236 at 9), which governs "Service on statutory agents for certain persons” and subsection 2 states that it does not apply to substituted service of process under s. 48.161 or s. 48.181.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Atria Holdings, S.A. v. Atl. Funding Cap. Corp. (M.D. Fla. 2025)…wn by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default.” However, before a clerk's default can be entered, the serving party must establish that the defaulting party was properly served. Laing v. Cordi, III, No. 2:11cv-566-FtM-29SPC, 2012 WL 4828312 at *1 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 10, 2012); Manheim Automotive Fin., Servs., Inc. v. Information Matrix Tech., Inc., No. 2:12-cv-360-FtM-29-SPC, 2012 WL 3947207 at *1 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 10, 2012). Here, the motions and supporting affidavits (Docs. 236, 237, 246…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Atria Holdings, S.A. v. Atl. Funding Cap. Corp. (M.D. Fla. 2025)