BRADLEY T. PACE
v.
SHARESE M. PACE
BRADLEY T. PACE
SHARESE M. PACE
295 So. 3d 898
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2021)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order finding Bradley T. Pace in contempt for the reasons we explained in Pace v. Pace, 295 So. 3d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (Pace I). The evidence presented at the hearing in this case is essentially identical to the evidence in Pace I.1 REVERSED and REMANDED.
EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur. 1 We observe that the trial court did not have the benefit of Pace I when rendering the instant order of contempt.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Eadie v. Gillis, 363 So. 3d 1115 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)…ion “did he ask for the makeup timeshare that the court ordered on September 2, 2022.” As we discuss below, Mother’s argument fails for two reasons. II. We use an abuse of discretion standard to review the trial court’s order. See Pace v. Pace, 295 So. 3d 898, 900 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020). A. We begin by observing that a court violates due process when it awards a remedy that a party did not seek. See Daniels v. Sorriso Dental Studio, LLC, 164 So. 3d 778, 782 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). This is true of both plea…
-
Pace v. Sharese M. Pace, 295 So. 3d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021)…PER CURIAM. We reverse the order finding Bradley T. Pace in contempt for the reasons we explained in Pace v. Pace, 295 So. 3d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (Pace I). The evidence presented at the hearing in this case is essentially identical to the evidence in Pace I.1 REVERSED and REMANDED. EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur. 1 We observe that the trial court…
-
R.L.G. v. State, 322 So. 3d 721 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Pace v. Sharese M. Pace, 295 So. 3d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021)