VERDELL HILL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
VERDELL HILL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
469 So. 2d 945
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1985)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The sentencing court which releases a defendant on community control has jurisdiction to revoke that release, not the Parole and Probation Commission. See § 948.06(1), Fla.Stat. (1983); Bradley v. State, 462 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Spurlock v. State, 449 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), review denied 466 So. 2d 212 (Fla.1985); Moore v. State, 463 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Clem v. State, 462 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Loveless v. Bryson, 460 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Smith v. State, 455 So. 2d 615 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH, SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Franklin v. State, 526 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)…the time of his resentencing.13 See Thomas v. State, 482 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), rev. denied, 491 So. 2d 281 (Fla.1986); Saavedra v. State, 478 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Wahl v. State, 474 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Cone v. State, 469 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). In conclusion, we find that a defendant may be sentenced to a term of incarceration to be followed by a period of probation and if the probation is violated after the term of incarceration has been completed, [*164] the defenda…
-
Richardson v. State, 472 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)…g only the manner in which the prisoner is sentenced, and thus would not be considered an ex post facto law. Dobbert v. Florida, 432 U.S. 282, 97 S.Ct. 2290, 53 L.Ed.2d 344 (1977); and Vaught v. State, 410 So. 2d 147 (Fla.1982). . In Cone v. State, 469 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), the Fifth District Court of Appeal has held that a defendant whose offense was committed prior to the effective date of the guidelines, and who elects to be sentenced under the guidelines, is properly sentenced under the guideli…
-
Colwell v. State, 471 So. 2d 1374 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)…e served on either burglary sentence. We think Colwell must be given credit for time served on both burglary sentences, since he was serving time for those two crimes, concurrently with the other valid and unchallenged sentences. See Cone v. State, 469 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). However, we affirm the trial court’s resentencing of Colwell to consecutive terms of imprisonment on each burglary count. That fact alone is insufficient to show such vindictiveness so as to violate Colwell’s due process rights…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Clem v. State, 462 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
- Capraro v. Lanier Bus. Prods., Inc., 466 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 1985)
- Spurlock v. State, 466 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 1985)
- Spurlock v. State, 449 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)
- Loveless v. Bryson, 460 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
- Hezekiah Smith v. State, 455 So. 2d 615 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
- Clement Moore v. State, 463 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- Bradley v. State, 462 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)