BROADFIRE CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION; EUGENE A. BROADBENT, SR. AND BETTY B. BROADBENT, HUSBAND AND WIFE; AND BROADFIRE INTERNATIONAL, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
JOHN E. TURREGANO AND BETTY M. TURREGANO, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Mootness Doctrine cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
After careful review of the record, we conclude that the trial court entered a temporary restraining order on February 25, 1983, which expired by its own terms on March 7, 1983, ten days after its entry. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.610(b). There being no valid court order extending the expiration period beyond the March 7 deadline, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Dehoff v. Imeson, 153 Fla. 553, 15 So. 2d 258 (1943); Auffant v. Shoultz, 388 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). The record shows that appellants removed. the vessel, the object of the temporary restraining order, from its designated location on March 29, 1983, twenty-two days after the temporary restraining order’s expiration. Consequently, it cannot be said that appellants violated an existing court order by removing the vessel on March 29, 1983.
Appeal DISMISSED.
BOARDMAN, A.C.J., SCHEB and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Jones v. State, 153 Fla. 553 (Fla. 1943)
- Dehoff v. Imeson, 153 Fla. 553 (Fla. 1943)
- THE Phifer State Bank v. Clark Gourley, 153 Fla. 595 (Fla. 1943)
- In the Interest of T. A. A. v. Shoultz, 388 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)