IN THE INTEREST OF T. A. A., A MINOR CHILD. JAMES R. AUFFANT, GUARDIAN AD LITEM/APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES C. SHOULTZ, DIRECTOR OF ORANGE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES, AND MEL COLMAN, SHERIFF OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEES; BARBARA ALLIN, APPELLANT, V. JAMES C. SHOULTZ, DIRECTOR OF ORANGE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES, AND MEL COLMAN, SHERIFF OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEES

Fla. 5th DCA | 1980-09-17
Nos. 79-211, 79-214
Upchurch, J., Orfinger, J., Cobb, J.
388 So. 2d 41 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Appeal dismissed as moot where appellant's sentence was commuted and she was reunited with her child, rendering the dispute over separation during incarceration no longer justiciable.


Holding

An appeal challenging the dissolution of a temporary injunction prohibiting separation of an incarcerated mother from her newborn child is dismissed as moot when the appellant's sentence is commuted and she is reunited with the child.


Headnotes

[1] An appeal becomes moot and will be dismissed when the circumstances giving rise to the dispute are resolved and the issue is not of general public interest and importance…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was imprisoned in July 1979 and gave birth on August 31, 1979. A temporary injunction was issued on September 1, 1979 prohibiting separation…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., Judge.

PRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., Judge.

Appellant appeals an order of the Circuit Court for Orange County dissolving a temporary injunction and dismissing a complaint which sought to prevent the Sheriff of Orange County and the Director of thé Orange County Correctional Facilities from separating appellant from her infant child while she was in prison.

In July of 1979, appellant was imprisoned to serve a term at Orange County Correctional Facility. She gave birth to a child at Florida Hospital on August 31, 1979. On September 1, 1979, a temporary injunction was issued prohibiting the separation or removal of the child. On September 6, 1979, the injunction was dissolved and the complaint dismissed by the order appealed.

In May of 1980, appellant’s sentence was commuted; she was placed on probation and reunited with her child. Therefore, the subject of this appeal, i. e., the propriety of the trial judge in dissolving the temporary injunction which had prohibited county officials from separating appellant from her child, has been rendered moot. Issues which have become moot will not be decided by the courts unless questions presented are of general public interest and importance. Dehoff v. Imeson, 153 Fla. 553, 15 So. 2d 258 (1943). Here the issue is not of general public interest and importance and as no practical result can be attained by reviewing this decision, the appeal is dismissed.

ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Heredia, 520 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
    …uspension of Heredia’s driver’s license. This being so, the instant appeal has been rendered entirely moot and must be dismissed. See Friends of the Everglades v. South Fla. Regional Planning Council, 447 So. 2d 902 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); In re T.A.A., 388 So. 2d 41, 42 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Gill v. City of North Miami Beach, 156 So. 2d 182, 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). It should be noted in this connection that the Department makes no contention that its subsequent action, which sought to revive its one-year restr…
  • Broadfire Corp. v. Turregano, 438 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
    …days after its entry. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.610(b). There being no valid court order extending the expiration period beyond the March 7 deadline, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Dehoff v. Imeson, 153 Fla. 553, 15 So. 2d 258 (1943); Auffant v. Shoultz, 388 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). [*958] The record shows that appellants removed. the vessel, the object of the temporary restraining order, from its designated location on March 29, 1983, twenty-two days after the temporary restraining order’s expiration. Cons…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw