HARRY PALY, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE

4th Cir. | 1955-05-09
No. 6963
221 F.2d 958 United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1955) Caution
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This :,s an appeal from a judgment for defendant in an action under the Tort Claims Act. - 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671 et seq. Plaintiff sustained injuries when the automobile which he was driving was in collision with an automobile driven by one Stefan, an enlisted member of the United States Naval forces. Stefan was driving his own privately owned automobile on the way to attend the funeral of a deceased serviceman under orders which directed him to travel at his own expense, subject to reimbursement, but did not direct him to use his own automobile. The trial judge filed a comprehensive opinion setting forth the facts in detail and it is not necessary to repeat them here. See Paly v. United States, D.C., 125 F.Supp. 798. The decision is affirmed'on 'the basis of that opinion, which is-adopted as an opinion of this Court, and of our decisions in United States v. Eleazer, 4 Cir., 177 F. 2d 914, certiorari denied 339 U.S. 903, 70 S.Ct. 517, 94 L.Ed. 1333, and United States v. Sharpe, 4 Cir., 189 F. 2d 239.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw