WOMSLEY ET AL.

v.

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 (U.S. 1964)
  …Colo. 493, 497-499, 179 P. 2d 232, 234-235 (1947) (approves Bruner but also quotes from Osborn v. People, supra, a case clearly stating the “orthodox” rule). Connecticut: State v. Buteau, 136 Conn. 113, 124, 68 A. 2d 681, 686 (1949), cert. denied, 339 U. S. 903 (1950); State v. McCarthy, 133 Conn. 171, 177, 49 A. 2d 594, 597 (1946). Florida: Leach v. State, 132 So. 2d 329, 333 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U. S. 1005 (1962); Graham v. State, 91 So. 2d 662, 663-664 (1956); Bates v. State, 78 Fla. 672, 676, 84…
• Hinson v. United States, 257 F.2d 178 (5th Cir. 1958)
  …pt. Westcott report to his assignment as ordered, and that he made use of his own automobile entirely for his own convenience and benefit. Therefore, it is contended in reliance upon United States v. Eleazer, 4 Cir., 177 F. 2d 914, certiorari denied 339 U.S. 903, 70 S.Ct. 517, 94 L.Ed. 1333; United States v. Sharpe, 4 Cir., 189 F. 2d 239; and Paly v. United States, 4 Cir., 221 F. 2d 958, as well as Georgia 4 cases which require that the travel undertaken must be in the furtherance of the very work assigned…
• Althea G. Williams v. United States, 215 F.2d 800 (9th Cir. 1954)
  …39 U.S. 964, 70 S.Ct. 998, 94 L.Ed. 1373. The “ ‘line of duty’ ” language was used to “more correctly” describe the conduct of military personnel in acting for the Government. United States v. Eleazer, 4 Cir., 177 F. 2d 914, 918, certio-rari denied 339 U.S. 903, 70 S.Ct. 517, 94 L.Ed. 1333. “Congress was undertaking with the greatest precision to measure and limit the liability of the Government, under the doctrine of respondeat superior”. United States v. Campbell, 5 Cir., 172 F. 2d 500, 503, certiorari…