STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
WILBERT THOMPSON, RESPONDENT
STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
WILBERT THOMPSON, RESPONDENT
401 So. 2d 1340
Florida Supreme Court (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
On January 14, 1981, this Court entered its order accepting jurisdiction and dispensing with oral argument. We have now determined that the Court is without jurisdiction, and therefore the Petition for Review is denied. 386 So. 2d 264.
No Motion for Rehearing will be entertained by the Court.
It is so ordered.
SUNDBERG, C. J., and BOYD, OVER-TON, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and MCDONALD, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. DiGUILIO, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 1986)…nt on a defendant’s invocation of his right to remain silent after he has answered some questions is constitutional error. See Peterson v. State, 405 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Thompson v. State, 386 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), review denied, 401 So. 2d 1340 (Fla.1981). We agree that the comment here is fairly susceptible of being interpreted by the jury as a comment on silence. State v. Hinchen, 490 So. 2d 21 (Fla.1985). Florida has long followed a per se reversal rule when a prosecutor comments on a…
-
DiGUILIO v. State, 451 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)…o remain silent, the interrogation must cease because the fifth amendment privilege has been exercised. Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96, 96 S.Ct. 321, 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); Thompson v. State, 386 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), pet. for rev. denied, 401 So. 2d 1340 (Fla.1981). Reversible error occurs in a jury trial when a prosecutor improperly comments upon or elicits an improper comment from a witness concerning the defendant’s exercise of his right to remain silent in the face of accusation, without conside…
-
THE Florida BAR v. Golden, 563 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 1990)…ack of remorse, and his lengthy history of past disciplinary actions. The Florida Bar v. Golden, 530 So. 2d 931 (Fla.1988) (ninety-day suspension); The Florida Bar v. Golden, 502 So. 2d 891 (Fla.1987) (ten-day suspension); The Florida Bar v. Golden, 401 So. 2d 1340 (Fla.1981) (public reprimand). The bar, pursuant to action by the board of governors, now seeks disbarment. We believe the referee’s recommendation is appropriate and should be approved. Had Golden’s practice been more direct or more substantial, w…
Authorities Cited
- Thompson v. State, 386 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)