-
131 F.2d 598·
5th Cir.·
1942-12-02
·cited 1×
A party wrongfully enjoined is entitled to recover just and adequate compensation for losses that are the natural and proximate result of the injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-05-01
The court granted the application for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiffs satisfied the requirements for its issuance.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-11-07
Head Kandy LLC sued former officer Kayla McNeill in federal court in Florida for allegedly misappropriating company funds through fraudulent expense reimbursements, unauthorized payroll charges, and disparaging statements that harmed the business. The court granted in part and de
-
Del. Ch.·
2023-03-22
The Court of Chancery found that the Agreement between the parties constituted an enforceable license to use the property, not a contract for the sale of real property, due to a lack of definite terms. The Court further held that the license was revoked by the matriarch in 2001,
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-03-17
The court granted MCINC's application for a preliminary injunction, finding that MCINC is likely to succeed on the merits of its claims for trademark, copyright, and patent infringement and that immediate and irreparable harm would occur if the injunction were not granted.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-01-24
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a worldwide asset restraint, finding that the judgment debtors were likely to dissipate or conceal assets, causing irreparable harm.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-01-10
The court held that a temporary restraining order should issue, but required the plaintiff to post a bond to protect the defendant from potential damages.
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2022-08-10
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-02-16
The court denied plaintiffs' motion for enhanced damages, finding that the case did not warrant such an award despite a finding of willful infringement.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-03-16
The court held that Pinnacle was not entitled to recover on the injunction bond because it was not wrongfully enjoined, and granted Pinnacle's motion to transfer the case to the Southern District of Florida.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-09-23
The court denied reconsideration of its prior order regarding costs and fees, finding no extraordinary circumstances or clear error to justify reopening the judgment.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2019-08-22
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining the defendants from distributing copyrighted works and using infringing trademarks.
-
260 So. 3d 1191·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2019-01-07
When a trial judge becomes aware of grounds for recusal at or before a hearing but issues a substantive order after that awareness, the order must be vacated and the matter remanded for a new hearing before an impartial judge.
-
265 So. 3d 446·
Fla.·
2018-10-04
-
219 So. 3d 967·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2017-05-31
Burke and her business entities appeal a trial court order granting a temporary injunction against them for allegedly breaching a non-competition agreement with their former employer, Sunco. The appellants challenged only the injunction bond amount and duration, not the injunctio
-
Del. Ch.·
2009-12-22
The Court held that Article V of the Deed Restrictions, which governs the approval of building plans, does not grant the homeowners association authority to regulate the complete demolition of a house where no replacement structure is planned. Consequently, the homeowners associa
-
927 So. 2d 148·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2006-04-26
Frengut appealed a judgment dismissing claims against multiple defendants based on the two dismissal rule and failure to state a cause of action. The court affirmed in part and reversed in part, holding that Martin and Law Firm were never parties to the earlier Broward case, so t
-
636 So. 2d 843·
Fla. 5th DCA·
1994-05-06
Ocean Landings appeals a trial court's order on remand requiring it to deposit funds collected after contract cancellation into the court registry. The appellate court affirms, finding the trial court properly followed the appellate court's earlier dissolution of the original inj
-
921 F.2d 69·
5th Cir.·
1991-01-18
The court held that the appeal was frivolous, dismissed it, and imposed monetary sanctions against the appellant.
-
242 So. 2d 177·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1970-12-22
Taxi companies that obtained a temporary injunction against Bal Harbour Village regarding taxicab permits appealed a judgment holding them liable on the injunction bond after the trial court dismissed their case on the merits. The court affirmed, holding that a plaintiff who fail