Writ Of Injunction

22 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Conover v. Honorable Frank M. Montemuro, Jr.
  477 F.2d 1073· 3d Cir.· 1972-12-20 ·cited 69×
  The court reinstated prior panel opinions, excluding portions on judicial immunity in § 1983 injunctive relief suits, and declined to rule on the issue.
• The Fed. Trade Comm'n v. J. Weingarten, Inc.
  336 F.2d 687· 5th Cir.· 1964-09-14 ·cited 34×
  The court held that the district court erred in enjoining the Federal Trade Commission's remand proceedings, as the FTC did not violate the Administrative Procedure Act's reasonable dispatch clause and the remand did not demonstrate prejudgment.
• State of Fla. ex rel. Louie L. Wainwright v. Holley
  234 So. 2d 409· Fla. 2d DCA· 1970-04-17 ·cited 31×
  The State of Florida challenged a circuit court order requiring delivery of a parolee to the Sheriff of Pinellas County after the parolee filed a petition for writ of injunction challenging parole revocation proceedings. The court held that the circuit court lacked venue to hear
• Powell v. Fla. Land & Improvement Co.
  41 Fla. 494· Fla.· 1899-06-01 ·cited 30×
  This case addresses whether an injunction remains in effect when an appeal with a supersedeas is pending. The court held that a supersedeas suspends the enforcement of an injunction, meaning violations during the appeal period cannot be punished as contempt.
• Baker v. Sard
  420 F.2d 1342· D.C. Cir.· 1969-10-15 ·cited 27×
  A request for release pending appeal from the dismissal of an action challenging parole revocation should be raised first in the District Court.
• Salomon Cohen v. L'Engle
  24 Fla. 542· Fla.· 1888-06-01 ·cited 20×
  The Florida Supreme Court denied a motion for a preliminary injunction pending appeal in an equity case, holding that while it may possess inherent power to issue injunctions in aid of its appellate jurisdiction, such power should be exercised only when indispensable to protect a
• Amendments TO Fla. Rule OF Crim. Procedure 3.853(d)(1)(A) (Postconviction DNA Testing). Dean C. Wilson v. State
  857 So. 2d 190· Fla.· 2003-09-30 ·cited 16×
  The Florida Supreme Court consolidates petitions seeking amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 regarding postconviction DNA testing and invokes its rulemaking jurisdiction to address the urgent matter. The Court suspends enforcement deadlines to preserve physical
• Fed. Home Loan Bank OF SAN Francisco v. Ammann
  225 F.2d 349· 9th Cir.· 1955-07-18 ·cited 12×
  The court granted the petition for writ of mandamus, directing the district court to comply with this court's prior mandates and to cease entertaining proceedings that relitigate already adjudicated issues.
• Walsh v. United States
  423 F.2d 687· 9th Cir.· 1970-03-04 ·cited 9×
  The court held that the District Court had jurisdiction to resentence the appellant and that the delay in resentencing did not violate his constitutional rights or statutory limitations.
• City OF DES Moines v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.
  264 F.2d 454· 8th Cir.· 1959-03-05 ·cited 8×
  A court cannot decree an ouster of a railway from a street without prior Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) approval, even if the railway's occupancy is based on a forfeited franchise, because such ouster may constitute an abandonment of an interstate line requiring ICC certifi
• Nasif v. United States
  165 F.2d 119· 5th Cir.· 1947-12-30 ·cited 8×
  The court held that a contempt conviction cannot stand if the defendant lacked knowledge of the specific injunction violated, and that injunctions must be construed narrowly to apply only to the property or conduct specifically enjoined.
• First Nat. Bank & Tr. Co. of Racine v. Vill. of Skokie
  173 F.2d 1· 7th Cir.· 1949-02-28 ·cited 7×
  A federal court lacks the power to enjoin state court foreclosure proceedings when the state court has acquired jurisdiction over the res, even if the federal court's action is in personam.
• Euge v. J. Earl Smith, M.D.
  418 F.2d 1296· 8th Cir.· 1969-12-10 ·cited 6×
  A federal court cannot grant an injunction to stay state court proceedings except in limited circumstances, and this case does not fall within those exceptions.
• Atl. Coast Line R. Co. v. Mack
  64 So. 2d 304· Fla.· 1952-10-18 ·cited 6×
• Sec'y of State Cord Byrd v. Black Voters Matter Capacity Bldg. Inst., Inc.
  339 So. 3d 1070· Fla. 1st DCA· 2022-05-27 ·cited 5×
  The appellate court reviewed a circuit court's decision to vacate a stay on a temporary injunction. The court found the temporary injunction unlawful because it granted affirmative relief rather than preserving the status quo, which is the sole purpose of such injunctions. The ca
• State ex rel. Pollack v. Saperstein
  67 So. 2d 911· Fla.· 1953-07-24 ·cited 4×
  The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the quashing of a writ of prohibition that sought to prevent an Assistant Municipal Judge and police officers from enforcing a city anti-noise ordinance against a construction contractor's agent. The court held that prohibition is not an appropr
• Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Holly
  135 F.2d 675· 7th Cir.· 1943-05-24 ·cited 4×
  Mandamus will not lie to compel a district judge to vacate an order remanding a cause to state court, nor does the appellate court have original jurisdiction to issue such writs.
• Ex parte Robert W. White. On Petition for a Mandamus
  4 Fla. 165· Fla.· 1851-01-01 ·cited 4×
  The Florida Supreme Court considered whether it had original jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus. The Court held that its original jurisdiction is limited to issuing certain remedial writs to maintain general superintendence and control over other courts, and not for general
• THE Florida BAR v. Corpa Immigr. Servs.
  642 So. 2d 548· Fla.· 1994-09-15 ·cited 2×
  The court approved a stipulation permanently enjoining Corpa Immigration Services from engaging in the unauthorized practice of law.
• St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Rosen Millennium, Inc.
  104 La. 603· M.D. Fla.· 2018-09-28
  An insurer has no duty to defend under a commercial general liability policy for a data breach caused by third parties, as the policy's 'personal injury' provision requires the insured to be the 'publisher' of the offending material.
• A. v. Ammann
  243 F.2d 748· 9th Cir.· 1957-04-15
  The court held that certain appeals from lower court orders must be remanded with directions to vacate those orders, as the issues had already been determined by this court in prior proceedings.