-
264 F. Supp. 2d 1062·
S.D. Fla.·
2003-05-29
·cited 1×
The court tentatively granted the motion to exclude expert testimony, allowing it to be reintroduced if plaintiffs present further evidence of deliberate indifference, and granted the motion to exclude evidence of other suicides.
-
88 F. Supp. 2d 1351·
S.D. Fla.·
1999-10-25
·cited 1×
The court held that a proposed settlement could not be approved over the objections of dissenting parties, and the case was dismissed based on the equitable defense of laches.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2026-01-15
Defendant Rhandy D. Massey filed a Rule 61 motion for postconviction relief claiming eight counts of ineffective assistance of counsel and one count of prosecutorial misconduct. The Superior Court denied all claims, finding that defendant failed to meet the Strickland standard an
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-12-03
The court denied the defendants' motion to stay discovery pending resolution of their motion to dismiss.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-03
The court granted the defendant's motion to stay the patent infringement action pending the conclusion of related Patent and Trademark Office reexaminations.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-01
The court denied plaintiff's motion for leave to amend to dismiss counts and granted defendant's unopposed motion for summary judgment.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-05-27
Arch Insurance Company, as surety on performance bonds for a Miami Beach construction project, sued A3 Development and related entities for breach of contract after they depleted funds, made wrongful demands under the bonds, and performed corrective work without notice to Arch. T
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-04-11
The court granted summary judgment for the plaintiff on the duty and breach elements of negligence, but denied summary judgment on other claims due to disputed material facts regarding notice, extent of damage, and causation.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-12-27
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their complaint, finding no apparent reason to deny it and deferring futility arguments to later dispositive motions.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-10-03
The court ruled on various motions in limine and other requests, granting some, denying others, and deferring rulings on certain issues.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-07-31
The district court granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a fourth amended complaint in a complex international hospitality case involving alleged injuries at an Iberostar hotel. The court found that jurisdictional discovery had been completed as contemplated in the schedul
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-07-12
The court largely adopts the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint, but modifies the recommendation by denying leave to amend and declining supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claim.
-
102 F.4th 1347·
11th Cir.·
2024-06-04
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the defendant's convictions for impersonating a federal officer, finding sufficient evidence that he "acted as such" and that the district court did not err in admitting prior bad acts evidence or in its jury instructions.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-05-10
The court granted in part and denied in part the defendant's motion in limine, excluding inadmissible character evidence, hearsay, and evidence of other alleged wrongs, but allowing testimony on age-related statements by Fosler.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-04-30
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint, finding that the potential for dismissal under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine was a matter for a motion to dismiss, not a motion to amend.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-03-14
The court held that the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 mandates an automatic stay of discovery proceedings when a motion to dismiss is filed in a securities fraud action.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2024-03-14
The appellate court affirmed the Industrial Accident Board's decisions, finding that the Board did not abuse its discretion in admitting the claimant's pre-existing medical records into evidence and that its denial of the claimant's petition for compensation was supported by subs
-
S.D. Fla.·
2024-01-21
The court held that the defendant failed to show good cause and diligence to supplement its invalidity contentions after the deadline, and amendment would cause undue prejudice to the plaintiff.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2024-01-10
The court granted in part and denied in part Defendant's motion in limine regarding 'me too' witnesses, allowing testimony from two witnesses while excluding others due to lack of comparability and potential prejudice.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-12-28
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend its complaint, finding good cause due to Defendant's delayed disclosure of a lease agreement.
-
Del. Ch.·
2023-12-13
The Court of Chancery granted Pilot Corporation's motion to strike the affirmative defenses of unclean hands and in pari delicto asserted by the Berkshire Defendants, finding they lacked the requisite nexus to Pilot's contractual claims. The Court also denied the Berkshire Defend
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-08-17
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-08-14
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint, finding no undue delay, prejudice, or futility in the proposed amendments.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-08-11
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a new trial and/or reconsideration, affirming its prior order that excluded the plaintiff's late-disclosed reverse-confusion theory of trademark infringement.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-07-12
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a third amended complaint, allowing them to add a new defendant.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-06-15
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a third amended complaint.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-05-23
A party seeking to amend its pleadings after a scheduling order deadline has passed must demonstrate good cause, which requires showing diligence in discovering the information supporting the amendment.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-19
The Court granted Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-02-22
The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint to add Audi AG as a defendant.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-02-01
The court held that evidence of a potential sale or divestiture of Shady Hills is not clearly inadmissible and therefore denied the motion in limine to exclude it.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-11-28
The court granted plaintiffs' unopposed motion for leave to amend their complaint, finding good cause despite the missed deadline.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-10-26
The court denied Taco's motion to dismiss GEM's inequitable conduct counterclaim but granted GEM's motion to strike and dismiss Taco's reply counterclaim.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-10-14
The court granted leave to amend the counterclaim to cure pleading deficiencies, finding that while the proposed pleading was a shotgun pleading, it was not futile and the prior pleadings also suffered from similar issues.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-10-11
The court held that a motion for reconsideration should be granted to allow a party to amend its complaint to add a reformation claim, based on newly discovered evidence.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-09-21
The court granted leave to amend to add claims against new defendants but denied leave to add a spoliation claim against the original defendant, finding it futile.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-08-22
The court held that a plaintiff's second amended complaint, filed without leave of court after the deadline, would be stricken and leave to amend denied.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-06-24
The court granted defendants' motion to amend their answer to specifically cite Fla. Stat. § 509.143(3) for immunity, finding good cause to extend the scheduling order deadline and that the proposed amendment was not futile as to the state law claim.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-06-02
The court granted in part and denied in part C&C's motion for a protective order, granted the EEOC's motion to amend the complaint, and granted unopposed motions for extensions of time.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-05-24
The court held that the plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint was permissibly filed under Rule 15(a)(1)(B) as it was timely filed after the defendants' answer, and alternatively, good cause existed to grant leave to amend.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-05-09
The court denied the defendant's motion to amend its answer and affirmative defenses because the defendant failed to demonstrate good cause for the delay under Rule 16(b).
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-03-21
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, finding no undue delay, prejudice, or futility.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-02-18
The court ruled on numerous exhibit objections, sustaining some and overruling others, to streamline the upcoming trial in an age discrimination case.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-12-08
The court held that reconsideration of its prior dismissal order was not warranted, and denied the plaintiffs' request for leave to file an amended complaint.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-10-28
The court denied defendants' motions to dismiss the second amended complaint, finding it sufficiently pleaded patent infringement, but denied plaintiff's motion for leave to file a third amended complaint.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-10-13
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend his complaint, allowing him one final opportunity to do so.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-10-08
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion to amend its complaint, allowing some new claims and defendants but disallowing a claim under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-09-28
The court denied the defendant's motion for leave to file a third-party complaint and amended answer because the motion was filed late, would cause undue delay and prejudice, and would require significant modifications to the existing case schedule.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-09-08
The court denied plaintiff's motion for leave to amend its complaint because the plaintiff failed to establish good cause for the late filing after the scheduling order deadline had passed.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-07-28
The court held that leave to file a second amended complaint is granted in part, allowing revisions to existing exemplar claims and party changes, but denying the addition of a new plaintiff due to futility.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-07-26
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a claim for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need against the doctor defendants, as his allegations primarily concerned differences in medical judgment and treatment choices. The court also denied the plaintiff's motio