-
634 So. 2d 750·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1994-03-30
·cited 124×
The City of Jacksonville appeals a temporary injunction granted to outdoor advertising companies challenging a charter amendment and ordinances requiring removal of their signs. The appellate court reverses, holding that the trial court failed to make adequate findings supporting
-
826 So. 2d 467·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2002-09-20
·cited 72×
The Yardleys appeal a trial court's temporary injunction favoring their neighbors, the Albus, regarding use of a five-foot easement on the Yardleys' property. The appellate court reversed, holding that the injunction order failed to comply with Florida Rules of Civil Procedure Ru
-
659 So. 2d 1046·
Fla.·
1995-08-24
·cited 41×
The Supreme Court of Florida reviewed a district court's decision to quash a temporary injunction that had prohibited the City of Jacksonville from levying fines against billboard companies for violating a sign ordinance. The court ultimately approved the district court's decisio
-
721 So. 2d 735·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1998-07-27
·cited 24×
The court reversed an injunctive order issued by the trial court that imposed requirements on the appellants regarding use of disputed property by a church, finding the injunction was legally insufficient because it was entered sua sponte without a proper request, contained manda
-
51 So. 3d 561·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2010-12-22
·cited 19×
Reliance Wholesale appeals from a trial court's denial of its motion for a temporary injunction against former employee Godfrey for violating non-compete and non-solicitation agreements. The appellate court reversed, holding that Reliance established the statutory prerequisites f
-
48 So. 3d 957·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2010-12-01
·cited 14×
HRH, an insurance broker, appeals the trial court's dissolution of a temporary injunction against former employee Grimmel, who violated a non-piracy clause by soliciting HRH's customers after starting a competing firm. The court reversed, holding that HRH established a legitimate
-
45 So. 3d 915·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2010-10-06
·cited 12×
Dr. Genchi appealed the denial of his motion for a temporary injunction seeking reinstatement of his medical staff privileges at Lower Keys Medical Center, which were not renewed because he failed to comply with a seven-year board certification requirement. The court affirmed the
-
706 So. 2d 347·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1998-01-21
·cited 11×
Cosmic Corp. and Ian Davis appealed a temporary injunction issued by the trial court that would have forced their business (Coco's Lounge) to cease operations. The Third District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the municipalities failed to meet the required burden for obta
-
976 So. 2d 1·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2007-12-05
·cited 8×
NRD Investments appealed a trial court's temporary injunction requiring it to restore a tenant's office to pre-construction condition. The appellate court affirmed, finding that the tenant Dr. Velazquez met all requirements for injunctive relief and that the trial court properly
-
717 So. 2d 1112·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1998-09-28
·cited 8×
Martha Cesery Taylor appeals from a trial court order denying her motion for temporary injunctive relief to prevent the sale of a $2.5 million oceanfront estate property and discharging her lis pendens. The court affirmed the denial of the injunction but reversed the discharge of
-
198 So. 3d 822·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2016-03-09
·cited 7×
Williams appeals an order freezing settlement funds held in her attorney's trust account to preserve assets for a quantum meruit claim by former counsel. The court reverses, holding that the trial court committed legal error by granting a temporary injunction without sufficient f
-
319 So. 3d 690·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-02-09
·cited 6×
Brian Giller appeals an omnibus order in trust litigation adjudicating motions filed by his adult children, Jason and Jamie Giller. The Third District Court of Appeal dismissed portions of the appeal as nonfinal and nonappealable, dismissed as moot the restraining order against G
-
655 So. 2d 209·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1995-05-24
·cited 6×
U.S. 1 Office Corp. appeals from a trial court order granting Falls Home Furnishings, Inc. a temporary injunction preventing U.S. 1 from interfering with Falls' advertising sign on U.S. 1's building. The appellate court affirmed, finding the trial court did not abuse its discreti
-
260 So. 3d 478·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2018-12-05
·cited 5×
The temporary injunction against the City's vacation rental ban was reversed as overbroad because Miami 21, which predated the state preemption statute's June 1, 2011 cutoff, is not preempted and permits short-term rentals as long as the property's predominant use remains permane
-
299 So. 3d 481·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2020-02-26
·cited 4×
The appellate court affirmed a trial court's order for a mandatory injunction. The injunction required appellants to return $19.5 million to an escrow account and prohibited further transfers, pending a determination of the appellee's ownership interest in the funds.
-
287 So. 3d 699·
Fla. 4th DCA·
2020-01-08
·cited 4×
Picture It Sold Photography appeals the denial of a temporary injunction to enforce a non-solicitation and non-compete agreement against former independent contractor Scott Bunkelman. The trial court found the restrictive covenants reasonable and that Bunkelman violated them, but
-
662 So. 2d 724·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1995-10-18
·cited 3×
The court held that a temporary injunction was improperly issued without sufficient factual findings or evidence presented by the petitioner.
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2018-10-08
·cited 2×
An unsworn motion for injunctive relief requires an evidentiary hearing before the trial court may grant a temporary injunction, and the trial court must enter factual findings to permit meaningful appellate review.
-
148 So. 3d 172·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2014-10-14
·cited 2×
The court held that a temporary injunction order must specify the reasons for its entry and be supported by clear, definite, and unequivocally sufficient factual findings for each of the four necessary criteria.
-
895 So. 2d 540·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2005-03-18
·cited 2×
The court held that a temporary injunction must include specific findings supporting the four required criteria and the reasons for its entry.
-
898 So. 2d 1037·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2005-03-11
·cited 2×
Shands at Lake Shore, Inc. appealed a trial court's grant of an emergency temporary injunction in favor of Dr. Frank Ferrero, who sought to enjoin the hospital from interfering with his medical staff privileges. The appellate court reversed, holding that Dr. Ferrero failed to dem
-
638 So. 2d 1017·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1994-06-15
·cited 2×
Betty Sue Neel appealed the trial court's issuance of a temporary restraining order (TRO) that prevented her from disposing of assets in a civil embezzlement case brought by her former employer, Williams Communication Services. The appellate court reversed, finding that Williams
-
325 So. 3d 981·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2021-07-28
·cited 1×
The appellate court affirmed a trial court's order granting a temporary injunction against the collection of school impact fees. The court found that the appellees demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and a likelihood of irreparable harm, which are neces
-
278 So. 3d 822·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2019-08-21
·cited 1×
The City of Miami appeals a trial court's order that stayed an internal administrative hearing and allowed an employee to bring multiple attorneys, contrary to city procedures. The appellate court reversed, finding the order constituted an improper temporary injunction issued wit
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2026-07-23
A temporary injunction requires proof of four elements: substantial likelihood of success on the merits, unavailability of an adequate remedy at law, irreparable harm absent the injunction, and that the injunction serves the public interest.
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2025-02-07
NATCO, LLC appealed a temporary injunction granted in a Circuit Court case against the Carls. The appellees confessed error, and the Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed the injunction order, vacating the temporary injunction.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2025-01-02
Mohammed Alsaloussi and Alsaloussi Holdings, LLC appealed a trial court's order granting an emergency temporary injunction that prohibited them from liquidating, selling, or disposing of a 2018 Porsche 911 Turbo Classic pending final judgment. The appellate court affirmed the inj
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2024-09-11
First Born Again Baptist appeals from a trial court order granting First Baptist Church of Greater Miami a temporary injunction to restore access to a church property. The court rejected First Born's res judicata defense based on a prior dismissed action and found the injunction
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2023-05-17
A party seeking a temporary injunction must establish all five elements—substantial likelihood of success on the merits, likelihood of irreparable harm, unavailability of an adequate remedy at law, that the threatened injury outweighs possible harm, and that issuance will not dis
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2023-05-17
-
358 So. 3d 472·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2023-03-24
An injunction in a receivership case must comply with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(c) by specifying reasons for entry and containing factual findings on all four elements required for an injunction: likelihood of irreparable harm, unavailability of adequate remedy at law
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-05-25
Unit owners challenged a special assessment levied by Star Lakes Association to fund reconstruction of Building 12 after a fire, arguing the assessment was invalid because it should have been limited to Building 12 residents or required a community-wide vote. The trial court init
-
85 So. 3d 556·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2012-04-13
Allograft Innovations appeals a temporary injunction prohibiting use of TissueNet's alleged trade secrets in chemical cleaning protocols for tissue sterilization. The court reversed the injunction, finding TissueNet failed to prove that Allograft Innovations used the same specifi
-
927 So. 2d 34·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2006-03-29
Liberty Behavioral Health Corporation challenged the Department of Children and Families' (DCF) Request for Proposals (RFP) specifications for a civil commitment facility for sexually violent predators, arguing that the 1% protest bond requirement was unconstitutional and that it
-
868 So. 2d 686·
Fla. 5th DCA·
2004-04-02
Florida appellate court quashed a temporary injunction because the trial court failed to make the requisite factual findings supporting the four preliminary injunction criteria.
-
870 So. 2d 135·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2003-12-31
Appellants challenged a trial court's temporary injunction order affecting disputed property. The appellate court reversed because the trial court failed to address the four required criteria for issuing a preliminary injunction and provided insufficient factual findings to suppo
-
752 So. 2d 1250·
Fla. 1st DCA·
2000-03-09
A temporary injunction order must specify the reasons for its entry and support each of the four necessary conclusions with clear, definite, and unequivocally sufficient factual findings. The order must also require a bond unless specific exceptions apply.
-
647 So. 2d 976·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1994-12-14
The court affirmed the granting of a temporary injunction but reversed the bond amount and remanded for further proceedings to determine the bond and enter a proper order with factual findings.