-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-06-11
The court granted the motion to intervene because the intervenor met the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b)(1)(B).
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-04-23
The court denied the motion for reconsideration because the movants failed to establish grounds for reconsideration, including timeliness and lack of prejudice, and thus could not show manifest injustice.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-07-06
The court held that Loisinette Leiva's motion to intervene was untimely and therefore denied.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-04-16
The court held that a non-party could intervene in a FLSA collective action and that the first-filed rule warranted dismissal of the later-filed action due to substantial overlap in parties and issues.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-02-12
The court denied the Curator's motion to intervene because it was untimely, conclusory, and failed to demonstrate inadequate representation by existing parties.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2019-12-19
The court held that Synovus Bank's motion to intervene was untimely and lacked a legally protectable interest, and that the settlement agreement was fair and in the best interest of the receivership estate.
-
248 So. 3d 1246·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2018-06-06
A trial court does not abuse its discretion in denying intervention when the intervenor seeks to raise new claims against the union that are outside the scope of the original enforcement action and would necessarily reopen settled negotiations.
-
Del. Ch.·
2013-09-05
The Court held that the Master Plan created an enforceable restrictive covenant requiring 130 acres to be set aside for the development of a golf course, but did not mandate perpetual operation of the golf course. The Court found that the County had waived its right to object to
-
689 F. Supp. 2d 1361·
S.D. Fla.·
2010-02-11
The court held that the Special Master did not exceed his authority in preparing a report outlining potential criminal conduct, and that defendants' procedural due process rights were not violated by the report's issuance or the seizure of documents.
-
158 F. Supp. 623·
S.D. Fla.·
2005-11-22
Monroe County's motion to intervene is denied because it is untimely and its interests are adequately represented by existing parties.
-
779 So. 2d 374·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2000-05-19
The court held that the trial court abused its discretion by denying the motion to intervene as untimely.
-
661 So. 2d 111·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1995-09-13
Hartford Fire Insurance Company, surety on construction bonds, appeals the trial court's denial of its motion to intervene in a breach of contract and defamation dispute between Better Construction and the School Board of Dade County. The appellate court reversed, holding that th
-
134 F.R.D. 235·
M.D. Fla.·
1994-01-12
The court held that Herbert Cooper's motion to intervene was untimely and denied it because he lacked a legally protectible interest and permissive intervention was unwarranted.
-
958 F.2d 112·
5th Cir.·
1992-04-15
The court held that the Association failed to establish a right to intervene, either statutorily, mandatorily, or permissively, under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 24(a) and (b).
-
946 F.2d 214·
3d Cir.·
1991-10-04
The court held that the Pennsylvania legislature, by enacting 18 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 1108, conferred a legal interest upon the District Attorney sufficient to intervene in proceedings involving the release of county prisoners, and the district court erred in denying intervention.
-
934 F.2d 1092·
9th Cir.·
1991-06-11
The court held that promotional obligations under paragraph 10a(4) of the consent decree do not continue to accrue annually after the decree's ten-year termination date. The court also held that Louis Calabro's motion to intervene was timely.
-
909 F.2d 1097·
7th Cir.·
1990-08-14
The court held that the appellant's procedural missteps, including filing a notice of appeal before intervening and moving to intervene in the appellate court, precluded her from intervening to appeal the denial of class certification.
-
899 F.2d 649·
7th Cir.·
1990-04-10
The court held that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not permit intervention as a silent party plaintiff over opposition.
-
880 F.2d 807·
5th Cir.·
1989-08-02
The court held that the district court abused its discretion by awarding the remaining fund balance to a charity under the cy pres doctrine, as the parties to the litigation had superior equitable claims.
-
840 F.2d 72·
D.C. Cir.·
1988-02-23
The court held that the district court's denial of the family's motion to intervene was not adequately supported by the record and must be remanded for further proceedings.
-
771 F.2d 1551·
D.C. Cir.·
1985-09-24
The court held that a motion to intervene filed after an appellate decision, without exceptional and imperative reasons, should be denied due to untimeliness and disruptive potential.
-
755 F.2d 1207·
5th Cir.·
1985-03-29
The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellants' motion to intervene because the motion was untimely.
-
721 F.2d 126·
3d Cir.·
1983-11-15
The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the incumbent union officer's motion to intervene as untimely.
-
S.D. Fla.·
1983-01-07
The court held that the charging parties' motion to intervene was untimely and that their interests were adequately represented by the EEOC, thus denying their motion.
-
681 F.2d 1269·
11th Cir.·
1982-07-15
The court held that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) remained an intervening party and its 1981 motion to intervene was unnecessary and improperly denied.
-
424 F.2d 192·
10th Cir.·
1970-04-02
The court denied the Union's motion to intervene in the contempt proceeding and denied the employer's motion to dismiss.