Temporary Injunction

1,006 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 229 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Union v. Boca Raton Club, Inc.
  73 So. 2d 867· Fla.· 1954-07-06 ·cited 14×
  A Florida Supreme Court decision addressing whether a labor union and individual employees could obtain equitable relief against a hotel employer for alleged unfair labor practices, including using company housing to coerce employees during a labor dispute. The court held that wh
• Peters v. S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co.
  70 So. 2d 547· Fla.· 1954-01-15 ·cited 14×·via Application For Temporary Injunction
  The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a suit seeking to enjoin a telephone company from discontinuing service at a motel following the sheriff's notification that gambling laws had been violated using those phones. The court held that while equity courts
• Miami Retreat Found. v. Ervin
  62 So. 2d 748· Fla.· 1952-12-19 ·cited 14×
  The Florida Supreme Court reversed a lower court decision that had found Miami Retreat Foundation not to be a charitable organization and had removed directors and granted Ruth Reed half the Foundation's assets. The court held that the Foundation qualified as a charitable organiz
• Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. Randolph
  164 F.2d 4· 8th Cir.· 1947-11-05 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the issuance of a temporary injunction was erroneous because the dispute constituted a labor dispute within the purview of the Railway Labor Act and Norris-LaGuardia Act, requiring administrative resolution.
• Bowles v. Rice
  152 F.2d 543· 6th Cir.· 1946-01-07 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the appeal was untimely because it was filed more than 30 days after the entry of the interlocutory order denying the injunction.
• In re S. State St. BLDG. Corp. Hofheimer v. Gold
  140 F.2d 363· 7th Cir.· 1943-12-15 ·cited 14×
  The court held that a party not formally recognized as a party in interest in bankruptcy reorganization proceedings, even if allowed to participate, lacks standing to appeal the court's orders.
• Harris v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.
  139 F.2d 571· 2d Cir.· 1943-11-10 ·cited 14×·via Motion For Temporary Injunction
  The court held that the District Court erred in disallowing statutory fees for depositions admitted into evidence.
• Simms v. Patterson
  53 Fla. 984· Fla.· 1907-01-01 ·cited 14×
  Robert Simms sought a temporary injunction against Wilson Patterson to enforce a five-year employment contract that prohibited Patterson from engaging in the liquor business in Florida or other states. The trial court denied the application for temporary restraining order, and th
• Weeks v. J. C. Turner Lumber Co.
  53 Fla. 793· Fla.· 1907-01-01 ·cited 14×
  The appellate court reversed a lower court's decision, finding that the bill of complaint was too vague to grant equitable relief. The court held that the complainant failed to clearly allege undisputed ownership of the land, which was necessary to justify an injunction against t
• Galencare, Inc. v. Bayfront HMA Med. Ctr, LLC
  Fla. 1st DCA· 2018-01-02 ·cited 13×
  A competitor hospital seeking a temporary injunction against a rival's provisional trauma center operations failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits because the statutory framework does not require the Department to consider whether trauma center posi
• Medco Data, LLC v. Bailey
  152 So. 3d 105· Fla. 2d DCA· 2014-11-26 ·cited 13×
  The court held that the trial court erred by failing to apply the statutory presumption of irreparable injury when considering a motion for temporary injunction to enforce a restrictive covenant.
• Randolph v. Antioch Farms Feed & Grain Corp.
  903 So. 2d 384· Fla. 2d DCA· 2005-06-17 ·cited 13×
  Appellants Randolph appealed from a temporary injunction order granted in favor of Antioch Farms Feed & Grain Corp. and Tony Sills. The appellate court affirmed the injunction but remanded for the trial court to enter proper factual findings and set an appropriate bond, as requir
• Meis v. Sanitas Serv. Corp.
  511 F.2d 655· 5th Cir.· 1975-04-18 ·cited 13×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in issuing a temporary injunction to preserve the status quo pending trial, as the plaintiffs made a sufficient prima facie showing of potential success on the merits and the injunction was properly molded to the circumstances.
• Gill v. City OF N. Miami Beach
  156 So. 2d 182· Fla. 3d DCA· 1963-09-24 ·cited 13×
  The court held that the appeal should be dismissed as moot because the election sought to be enjoined has already occurred.
• Hines v. Hester Dozer
  134 So. 2d 548· Fla. 3d DCA· 1961-11-22 ·cited 13×
  This case involves a dispute over a recall election for city commissioners in Opa Locka, Florida. The court reversed a temporary injunction that had halted the recall process, finding the grounds for recall stated in the affidavit were sufficient to proceed.
• Kilnapp v. Kilnapp
  140 So. 3d 1051· Fla. 4th DCA· 2014-06-04 ·cited 12×
  The appellate court held that the trial court violated the husband's due process rights by prematurely ending an evidentiary hearing without allowing him to present his evidence.
• Colonial Bank, N.A. v. Taylor Morrison Servs., Inc.
  10 So. 3d 653· Fla. 5th DCA· 2009-04-03 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the trial court abused its discretion in granting a temporary injunction because the party seeking it did not demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits.
• Wachovia Bank v. Tien
  534 F. Supp. 2d 1267· S.D. Fla.· 2007-08-06 ·cited 12×
  The court held that genuine issues of material fact precluded summary judgment, requiring a trial to determine ownership of the disputed bank accounts.
• Omni Nat'l Bank v. Ga. Banking Co.
  951 So. 2d 1006· Fla. 3d DCA· 2007-03-21 ·cited 12×
  Omni National Bank appeals the trial court's denial of its motion to intervene in a fraud case and the resulting default judgment favoring Georgia Banking Company. The appellate court reverses, holding that Omni had a direct and immediate interest in the disputed funds that satis
• Wade v. Brown
  928 So. 2d 1260· Fla. 4th DCA· 2006-05-24 ·cited 12×
  The court held that a temporary injunction was improperly granted because the record failed to demonstrate irreparable harm.
• Sprint Corp. v. Telimagine, Inc.
  923 So. 2d 525· Fla. 2d DCA· 2005-12-28 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the trial court erred in granting a temporary injunction because the parties' agreement did not contemplate such relief under the circumstances, but affirmed the denial of the motion to dismiss.
• Passalacqua v. Naviant, Inc.
  844 So. 2d 792· Fla. 4th DCA· 2003-05-14 ·cited 12×
  In this appeal, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court's grant of a temporary injunction enforcing a non-compete agreement between Naviant, Inc. and two former employees, Nicholas Passalacqua and Matt Sechter. The court held that Naviant failed to demonstrate
• Soud v. Kendale, Inc.
  788 So. 2d 1051· Fla. 1st DCA· 2001-04-26 ·cited 12×·via Temporary Injunction Requirements
  The Florida First District Court of Appeal reversed a temporary injunction granted ex parte against the Jacksonville City Council, holding that the trial court failed to comply with Rule 1.610(a) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires certification of notice effo
• City OF Boca Raton v. Boca Raton Airport Auth.
  768 So. 2d 1191· Fla. 4th DCA· 2000-09-20 ·cited 12×
  A temporary injunction entered without notice to a party is improper if the moving party cannot demonstrate specific facts showing why notice would precipitate irreparable injury or that the time required for notice would permit the injury to occur.
• First Miami Sec., Inc. v. Bell
  758 So. 2d 1229· Fla. 4th DCA· 2000-05-24 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a temporary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate irreparable harm and a likelihood of success on the merits.
• EL Segundo Original REY DE LA Pizza Cubana, Inc. v. REY Pizza Corp.
  682 So. 2d 697· Fla. 3d DCA· 1996-11-13 ·cited 12×·via Temporary Injunctive Relief
• Smith v. Knight
  679 So. 2d 359· Fla. 4th DCA· 1996-09-11 ·cited 12×
  Smith appeals a temporary injunction issued ex parte by the trial court that enjoined him from competing with Knight's business. The Fourth District reversed, holding that Knight failed to satisfy the strict requirements for an ex parte temporary injunction because the alleged in
• Marschel v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
  609 So. 2d 718· Fla. 2d DCA· 1992-12-02 ·cited 12×
  In this interlocutory appeal, the Florida Second District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court's order granting a temporary injunction that stayed arbitration proceedings. The court held that under the Federal Arbitration Act, statute of limitations defenses should be decided b
• City OF Fort Pierce v. Gloria and John H. Dickerson
  588 So. 2d 1080· Fla. 4th DCA· 1991-11-13 ·cited 12×
  The trial court lacked jurisdiction to grant a temporary injunction via a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief when the underlying administrative decision was quasi-judicial and reviewable only by certiorari.
• Cutler Creek Vill. Townhouse Ass'n, Inc. v. Cutler Creek Vill. Condo. Ass'n, Inc.
  584 So. 2d 103· Fla. 3d DCA· 1991-07-30 ·cited 12×·via Temporary Injunction Requirements
• Freni v. Collier Cnty.
  573 So. 2d 1054· Fla. 2d DCA· 1991-02-06 ·cited 12×
  The appellate court affirmed the trial court's order denying a temporary injunction because the issue became moot after the referendum passed.
• Chesler v. Hyman B. Hendler
  428 So. 2d 730· Fla. 4th DCA· 1983-03-16 ·cited 12×
  This case involves appeals from non-final orders in a complex corporate litigation. The appellate court reviewed orders related to a temporary injunction, appointment of a receiver, dismissal of a complaint, and disqualification of counsel, ultimately affirming the dissolution of
• Goldberg v. Simoni
  601 F.2d 653· 2d Cir.· 1979-06-28 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the district court's abstention order, which stayed proceedings pending state court determination of state law issues, is appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) as a denial of a temporary injunction.
• Oakwood Manor, Inc. v. ECK
  358 So. 2d 585· Fla. 2d DCA· 1978-05-10 ·cited 12×
  Oakwood Manor appeals a judgment denying damages on an injunction bond posted by S & E Enterprises when S & E obtained a temporary injunction against Oakwood in 1971. The court reverses and remands, holding that the dismissal of S & E's underlying suit does not automatically esta
• Wooten v. The First Nat'l Bank OF ST. Paul
  490 F.2d 1275· 8th Cir.· 1974-02-01 ·cited 12×
  The court held that appeals from the dismissal of a party and the denial of a three-judge court are not reviewable without a final order, and affirmed the denial of a temporary injunction.
• Hoffman v. White
  235 So. 2d 43· Fla. 4th DCA· 1970-05-13 ·cited 12×
  In a declaratory judgment action over insurance proceeds, the trial court granted a temporary injunction against Stella Hoffman without bond. The appellate court reversed, finding the trial court failed to comply with procedural requirements for issuing injunctions without bond u
• Rich v. Rich
  214 So. 2d 777· Fla. 4th DCA· 1968-10-14 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the trial court correctly vacated the temporary injunction and quashed service of process for relief requiring in personam jurisdiction, but erred in not allowing plaintiff to amend her complaint regarding custody.
• Selma Schwartz & Butler Realty Corp. v. Sherman
  210 So. 2d 469· Fla. 3d DCA· 1968-04-30 ·cited 12×
  This appeal addresses whether a trial court had jurisdiction over consolidated cases to void a judgment obtained through collusion and determine preference among competing judgments, and whether attorney's fees were properly awarded as costs. The court upheld the substantive judg
• Nalco Chem. Co. v. Merwin G. Hall
  347 F.2d 90· 5th Cir.· 1965-06-22 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a temporary injunction, as the returned confidential information and the unlikelihood of enforcing the non-competition clause justified the denial.
• Aloys Holzer and Lawrence Holzer v. United States
  244 F.2d 562· 8th Cir.· 1957-06-05 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a temporary injunction, as the appellate court does not decide the merits on such an appeal.
• McAllister v. McAllister
  147 Fla. 647· Fla.· 1941-07-01 ·cited 12×
  The Florida Supreme Court reviewed a chancery court order denying the defendant's motion to dismiss and motion to strike in a suit by an ex-wife to enforce a property settlement and maintenance agreement requiring monthly payments of $300. The court held that the chancellor prope
• Atl. Coast Line R.R. Co. v. State
  106 Fla. 278· Fla.· 1932-07-26 ·cited 12×
  The Florida Supreme Court held that while the State Railroad Commission may regulate intrastate passenger service on interstate trains and require notice of discontinuance, it cannot enjoin the discontinuance of an interstate train itself. The Court reversed the injunction restra
• Glasswall, LLC v. Monadnock Constr., Inc.
  187 So. 3d 248· Fla. 3d DCA· 2016-01-27 ·cited 11×·via Motion For Temporary Injunction
  Glasswall appeals orders denying its motion for a temporary injunction to stay a New York arbitration and granting a stay of Florida circuit court cases pending arbitration. The court affirms, finding that the parties' incorporation of the AAA's Construction Industry Arbitration
• Sini v. Citibank, N.A.
  849 F. Supp. 2d 1345· S.D. Fla.· 2014-02-19 ·cited 11×
  The court held that exceptional circumstances warranted abstention under the Colorado River doctrine due to the parallel state court action, and therefore stayed the federal proceedings.
• McCARTY v. Myers
  125 So. 3d 333· Fla. 1st DCA· 2013-10-23 ·cited 11×
  The court held that the Provider Plaintiffs lacked standing to bring an access-to-courts challenge because they did not allege a violation of their own constitutional rights, and their economic harm was insufficient to confer standing.
• Manatee Cnty. v. 1187 Upper James OF Fla., LLC
  104 So. 3d 1118· Fla. 2d DCA· 2012-11-16 ·cited 11×·via Motion For Temporary Injunction
  Manatee County appealed the denial of its motion for a temporary injunction requiring a restaurant to comply with entertainment restrictions in a county ordinance. The Second District reversed, holding that the County established a likelihood of success on the merits and that the
• Whitby v. Infinity Radio, Inc.
  961 So. 2d 349· Fla. 4th DCA· 2007-06-06 ·cited 11×
  Elena Whitby appeals a trial court order enforcing a civil contempt sanction for violating an injunction based on a non-compete agreement in her former employment with radio station WEAT. The appellate court affirmed the $100,000 contempt fine, finding the trial court retained ju
• Semple v. Nanci Semple
  763 So. 2d 484· Fla. 4th DCA· 2000-07-05 ·cited 11×
  Raymond Semple appeals a domestic violence injunction and temporary custody award, claiming he was denied due process because the trial court failed to conduct a full evidentiary hearing before issuing the permanent injunction and awarding custody to his ex-wife. The court revers
• Cosmic Corp. v. Miami-Dade Cnty.
  706 So. 2d 347· Fla. 3d DCA· 1998-01-21 ·cited 11×
  Cosmic Corp. and Ian Davis appealed a temporary injunction issued by the trial court that would have forced their business (Coco's Lounge) to cease operations. The Third District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the municipalities failed to meet the required burden for obta
• Duryea v. Slater
  677 So. 2d 79· Fla. 2d DCA· 1996-07-19 ·cited 11×·via Temporary Injunction Requirements
  Dan Duryea appeals a temporary injunction that removed a hold he placed on a law firm's checking account and prevented his access to the account. The court reverses, finding the trial court failed to adequately prove the four required criteria for granting an extraordinary tempor