Seeking Injunction

22 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Deal v. The Cincinnati Bd. OF Educ.
  369 F.2d 55· 6th Cir.· 1966-12-06 ·cited 132×
  A school board has no constitutional duty to bus students or alter school sites solely to alleviate racial imbalance that it did not cause. However, if racial imbalance was intentionally caused by discriminatory state action, the board must take affirmative steps to remedy the si
• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.
  497 F.2d 473· 5th Cir.· 1974-07-15 ·cited 107×
  The court held that Koscot's promotional scheme constituted an investment contract under the federal securities laws, reversing the district court's denial of an injunction.
• Sierra Club v. Hickel
  433 F.2d 24· 9th Cir.· 1970-09-16 ·cited 48×
  The court held that the granting of a preliminary injunction was an abuse of discretion and must be reversed, despite the plaintiff having standing.
• Am. Gen. Ins. Co. & Fid. & Deposit Co. of Md. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n
  496 F.2d 197· 5th Cir.· 1974-06-27 ·cited 36×
  The court held that plaintiffs had not exhausted their administrative remedies and that premature judicial intervention was not warranted.
• The Bd. OF Trade OF the City OF Chicago v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n
  605 F.2d 1016· 7th Cir.· 1979-09-12 ·cited 18×
  The Commodity Futures Trading Commission's determination of an emergency under Section 8a(9) of the Commodity Exchange Act is committed to agency discretion and is not judicially reviewable.
• Retail Clerks Union v. Retail Clerks Int'l Ass'n
  479 F.2d 54· 9th Cir.· 1973-04-19 ·cited 16×
  The court held that a district court has discretion to determine if an emergency exists justifying trusteeship imposition and acted within its discretion by staying the trusteeship pending a hearing.
• Berrigan v. Sigler
  499 F.2d 514· D.C. Cir.· 1974-05-01 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the Parole Board's denial of a parolee's request to travel to North Vietnam was a valid exercise of its supervisory authority, considering both the parolee's status and national interest concerns.
• Hamker v. Diamond Shamrock Chem. Co.
  756 F.2d 392· 5th Cir.· 1985-04-01 ·cited 13×
  A citizen suit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act requires an allegation that the defendant is currently in violation of an effluent standard, limitation, or order, and does not permit suits for past violations or to recover damages.
• Turner v. The Littleton-Lake Gaston Sch. Dist.
  442 F.2d 584· 4th Cir.· 1971-03-23 ·cited 10×
• Schustack v. Lt. General Thomas W. Herren
  234 F.2d 134· 2d Cir.· 1956-06-01 ·cited 10×
• Yablonski v. United Mine Workers OF Am.
  459 F.2d 1201· D.C. Cir.· 1972-03-17 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the death of the plaintiff and the completion of the union election did not render moot the claims for actual and punitive damages, nor the right of the plaintiff's heirs to continue the suit for those damages.
• David Banks b/n/f Rosemary Banks v. Muncie Cmty. Schs.
  433 F.2d 292· 7th Cir.· 1970-07-08 ·cited 7×
  The court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove racial discrimination in the school district's site selection, bussing policies, or the use of Confederate symbols, and thus affirmed the district court's judgment.
• Whildon L. Moyer v. Citicorp Homeowners, Inc.
  799 F.2d 1445· 11th Cir.· 1986-09-22 ·cited 6×
  The dissenting judge holds that the contract's foreclosure notice provision is inconsistent with the DIDMCA and prior case law, and therefore the creditor is not entitled to federal preemption of state usury laws.
• Ekas v. Carling Nat'l Breweries, Inc.
  602 F.2d 664· 4th Cir.· 1979-08-03 ·cited 6×
  The union possessed the authority to modify the collective bargaining agreement to merge seniority lists, and in doing so, it did not breach its duty of fair representation to the Beltway employees.
• Brandenfels v. DAY
  316 F.2d 375· D.C. Cir.· 1963-02-14 ·cited 5×
  The court held that the district court properly dismissed the complaint because the appellant had consented to the procedure followed by the Post Office Department and therefore could not complain about the outcome, and because there was no case or controversy with the FTC.
• Perkins v. Bergland
  608 F.2d 803· 9th Cir.· 1979-11-21 ·cited 4×
  The court held that while grazing permit reductions are generally reviewable under FLPMA, the scope of review is limited to whether the agency's factual findings regarding range conditions and carrying capacity are arbitrary and capricious.
• City OF Coral Gables v. Baljet
  263 So. 2d 273· Fla. 3d DCA· 1972-06-08 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the trial court's judgment enjoining the city's incinerator operation was in accordance with the prior mandate and that the evidence was sufficient to establish a violation of the county code, even without a stack test.
• Washington v. McGRATH
  182 F.2d 375· D.C. Cir.· 1950-04-17 ·cited 4×
• Jean v. Wolf
  M.D. Fla.· 2021-02-22
  The court held that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to review the plaintiff's claim, as it constituted an indirect attack on a final removal order.
• Hess's Dep't Stores, Inc. v. Ernest W. Hahn, Inc.
  901 F.2d 552· 6th Cir.· 1990-04-27
  A landlord's right to alter common areas under a lease is not restricted by provisions concerning temporary closures or reciprocal use rights, nor by initial development plans or modifications, as long as a specified parking ratio is maintained.